Sunday, March 18, 2007

NOTES ON THE FOLEY REPORT (Compiled)

THE FOLEY REPORT

CHAPTER ONE: Inauspicious Beginnings, 1855-1879

(These are notes, not the original text. This chapter is 31 pages long and has 95 footnotes.)

Knowing that the Gros Ventre were a separate entity, the US lumped them in with Blackfeet. For the next fifteen years the US was not able to protect any of these native people from whiskey traders or regular assaults of early white Montanans, even when they came to Fort Benton to receive their annuity goods.

Negotiations for this treaty were initiated by Isaac Stevens, Governor of Washington Territory (which included Montana at that time). He wanted to extend railroads and telegraph systems across the high prairie. Alfred Cumming of the Office of Indian Affairs was assigned to Stevens as part of an official Treaty Commission. The two men didn’t agree on anything. Stevens was the more generous in terms of allocations for agriculture. Cummings said the Indians didn’t care about farming and the money would go into the hands of sharks. He turned out to be right.

But the Blackfeet and Gros Ventre tribes were added to the “Peace of the Plains” treaty at Fort Laramie in 1851, which they had previously snubbed. They were supposed to get $15,000 per year for ten years, but this was attached to their annuities.

Annuity goods could not be dependably transported to the Blackfeet, even as far as Fort Benton which shallow-draft steam boats could reach. Private trading companies contracted to deliver. Contracts were not awarded to the best bidders on various rationalized grounds. The goods sent were of little use or interest to the Blackfeet. (Esp. the smallpox that came along with them.)

Agent Vaughn was specific: “The gintiuella or sky blue Blanket is high-priced, inferior & not desired; fancy list cloths are too fine and too flimsy; worsted yarn supplied no want in the lodge or field; calicoes of all kinds & descriptions are badly adapted for use or comfort on the prairie; Calico shirts are far inferior in durability to the common hickory; the N.W. guns are literally worthless... the powder horns and fine and unsubstantial, easily cracked and injured; butcher knives and half axes inferior in material and unreliable in temper... the fire steels furnished are worse than useless, being no more than common iron.”

Vaughn was a good agent, married to an Indian. (At least he got a little town named for him.) He put most of his energy and resources into the farm at Sun River and begged for the government to regulate the buffalo robe trade. His farm lost its crops to drought one year and spring flooding the next, illustrating the gambling dimension to Montana farming that persists today. He was terminated in 1861 and replaced by Henry Reed, the first in a series of “weak, inept men.”

In 1861 the annuities supposedly burned with the steamboat Chippewa. Chouteau and Malcolm Clark, both opportunists, offered their “help” and a pile of bills for “expenses.” No one knows whether any annuities ever reached the Blackfeet. In 1863 Sioux attacked the steamboard carrying Reed and the annuity goods, so they turned around. Reed stayed in Iowa, leaving the goods in a fort, where they mysteriously disappeared. James Vail, the Agency “farmer;” Malcolm Clark; and a Fort Benton attorney named Robert Lemon who claimed to have authority from Agent Reed, dispersed the goods as favors, payment for buffalo robes, and salary equivalents for Vail and his wife (also on the payroll, as was customary). No Indians received instruction and only 34 acres of crops were planted.

In 1884-85 the new agent was Gad E. Upson who was interested in private mining and had two quartz ore mills sent to him. He also wanted full control of all moneys without having to get authorization or give an accounting, on grounds that it would be more efficient. He noted that the whiskey trade was walking off with the annuity goods which the people traded for booze. He said the Sun River farm was in terrible condition, falling apart, animals and equipment missing, but rehired James Vail -- the very man who put it in this state. Again annuities failed to arrive.

In January 1865, when the Montana Territory was created, Upson recommended a new Blackfeet treaty that would snuff all Indian title to the land, on grounds that it would end bloodshed. Upson died on his way to Washington, D.C. The deputy, Hiram Upham, served as the Agency clerk until 1871, then went to work for Indian Trader T.C. Power.

1865 was the year Lincoln was assassinated. The situation in Montana descended into total chaos when the tribe sank into alcoholism and despair on realizing how much they had been cheated and how little recourse they had. Enmity erupted between Blackfeet and Gros Ventre to the point that the Gros Ventre were completely shut out of annuities. White ruffians, some of them war veterans, picked fights with Blackfeet (there are many small incidents), and then claimed there was a “war.” In 1867 Acting Governor Thomas Francis Meagher issued a “proclamation for volunteers to join the war against the Blackfeet.” Probably due to his own drinking problem, he evidently fell overboard from a boat anchored at Fort Benton and drowned. His body was not found.

The actual governor, Green Clay Smith, was in Washington, D.C., where he was trying to get all Indian payments made in cash to his name so he could manage them more efficiently. Special Agency Nathaniel Pope made an honest report about all this tragedy and recommended that the Blackfeet Agency be removed from Fort Benton with its webwork of conspiring merchants and whiskey traders.

In 1868 another earnest Special Agent, William J. Cullen, advised that Upson’s treaty negotiations were nonexistent, recommended moving the southern boundary to the Teton River, and said Agent Wright was not even fit to live with Indians, much less have charge. On his side, Wright accused Governor Smith of using Blackfeet money to pay a loan and speculate in mining as well as gambling in Virginia City.

I. G. Baker’s whiskey wagons were intercepted, which made him very angry, since everyone else was doing it and the laws were not enforced. Interior Secretary Browning said they were, too. Baker’s riposte was “Oh, yeah? Then why are there thirty thousand white settlers on Indian lands?”

Lt. Col. Alfred Sully was appointed Superintendent of Indian Affairs. He could not stop the whiskey trade nor intercept the growing violence on the part of some Indians. He couldn’t get food to the people. He couldn’t close the border to Canada. His reaction, sustained by his superiors, was military. The result was the notorious Baker Massacre. Smallpox was striking at the same time. The Blackfeet went flat.

Sully’s replacement, Jasper A.Viall, was far more effective. He planted a spy among the whiskey traders, confronted I.C. Baker and T.C. Power in their corruption, and attacked the many other contracting and corrupted entities. McCauley, the Blackfeet agent, seemed to be honest but was being assailed by the local Republicans because he was a Democrat.

No one expected the Blackfeet to persist in the face of all this. In full expectation that they would simply disappear, whites illegally moved onto Indian lands believing that they would become legal. Since their presence was unacknowledged, they didn’t have to take notice of restrictions, requirements, fees or titles.


CHAPTER TWO: Disintegration & Survival 1870 - 1886

(This chapter of the Foley Report is 51 pages long and has 157 footnotes.)

Part One: Whiskey Traders and Methodists, 1870-1876

In 1869 the Blackfeet Agency is removed to just north of the town of Choteau, where the tribe was once again swept by smallpox. (The depressions over the many graves remain today.) The whiskey traders came along with them. President Grant (like George W. Bush) decided the way to address corruption was “faith-based” management and assigned the Blackfeet to the Methodists, though they’d always been affiliated with the Jesuits. Cattlemen and merchant princes used the reservation lands as though they were unowned, a “commons.”

The best known whiskey posts were Forts Whoop-Up, Standoff, and Slideout. Individuals were John J. Healy and Alfred B. Hamilton. (For more detail see Hugh Dempsey’s book, “Firewater,” which surprised local Blackfeet scholars when they found familiar names -- their own. Joe Kipp was prominent among them.) Shielding themselves with secrecy, backers of this trade included I. G. Baker and his partners Charles and William Conrad and rival T.C. Power. Finally the chaos and violence became so bad that the Benton merchants helped the newly organized Canadian Royal Mounted Police shut down the whiskey trade. They were coming to value order partly because they were after supply deals for the Mounties and transportation routes for settler supplies. Benton was “the Chicago of the Prairies.”

The earliest Methodist nominees fell short of ideal. The first lasted less than three months, just long enough to disperse all the annuities among 825 Indians, leaving several thousand others with nothing. Joshua Armitage was dismissed for drunkenness in 1872. William Ensign was indicted by a Montana grand jury for embezzlement and selling the annuities to whites.

Cattleman R.S. Ford (inducted into the National Cowboy Hall of Fame) brought several thousand cattle into the Sun River Valley part of the reservation. Cattlemen felt justified since the 1860’s agreements were never ratified by Congress. Finally in 1874 the politicians had the boundary of the reservation moved north by administrative order. “Inform Dan Floweree,” they directed, so he would know he was finally legal, despite agent Richard F. May trying to resist. The cows had already jumped the gun by filling the Teton River valley.

May insisted that the Bentonites fulfill their transportation contracts and blocked payment to get their attention, whereupon they got him removed. Maginnis was the main link with Washington and his buddy Rainsford, non-Methodist, became the chief clerk of the agency. The new agent was John S. Wood, who moved the agency to Badger Creek (now called “Old Agency.”) Wood, who also balked at the shortcomings of the transporters, was removed, leaving Rainsford to run everything.

By now the Bentonites were tiring of crime and chaos, and began to impose reforms on themselves, since their income was now coming from supplying such needs as the postal deliveries into Canada and supply routes to the remaining forts. On the way back, they brought coal for Benton stoves. Nationally, Indian affairs were in a state of scandal. The most effective Methodist missionary was Brother Van Orsdel who took one look at the Indians and decided he wanted nothing to do with them. He was very successful among the whites.

Part Two: Tributary to the Bentonites, 1876 - 1884

John Young, sixty years old and the best among the Methodist agents, came from Brooklyn, NY, in 1876. He replaced Rainsford with his son, John, Jr. and built the first latrines. (Until then, everyone went out into the “brush.”) His daughters were hired to teach and he instituted the practice of telling the Christmas story and handing out candy afterwards, a ceremony which immediately caught on and continued for the next hundred years. He tried to run off the Jesuits of St. Peter’s Mission.

Finally he ran afoul of the end of the buffalo and was blamed for the Starvation Winbter of 1883-84. As customary for agents, he was depositing reservation money into his private account in Helena. He had a friend and ally in T.C. Power. When reporting to the US Government, he was over-optimistic, which encouraged the government to underfund and fail to provide enough food. Canada was having similar problems, so the Canadian Blackfeet were coming south in hopes of finding food. There were rumors that the Indians would storm the agency stockade on Badger Creek.

Just off the reservation, the little renegade town of Robare had formed. Joe Kipp’s headquarters, whiskey traders, and the banned Jesuits all lived side-by-side, but even there among rustlers people were starving. Pretty soon even Young had to admit the Blackfeet were starving while white cattle trespassed. By now the military was taking the side of the Blackfeet, saying there were no signs of an uprising, that the people were starving, and that when they inspected some of the food Power sent, it was inedible and they sent it back. The Indians began to eat their own cattle.

The old “Indian ring” of Benton merchants were now a “cattle ring” and preparing for the railroad. (Foley never mentions the Masonic connection.) Charles and William Conrad had bought out Isaac Baker’s business, but they created a corporation which the three ran together. Baker stayed in St. Louis, Charles Conrad supervised the Canadian branch, and William Conrad managed the freighting business out of Benton. They put their money into the Conrad Circle Company, headquartered in Benton. A complex of enterprises drew together Conrad Kohrs, Granville Stuart, Power, Broadwater, and Ford, whose interests were protected by Hauser and Maginnis. This was the “Gilded Age” when the government protected the wealthy. (No comment.)

Finally Young began to make a real ruckus about starvation among the Blackfeet with predictable results. William Conrad headed the grand jury that indicted him, claiming that he was allowing Indians to kill white men’s cattle and that, at age 72, he kept “a harem of young Indian girls.” Special Agent Cyrus Beede cleared him of charges. Children were dying, the local cattlemen refused to sell beef to the reservation, and large herds of cattle grazed their way from Texas to Alberta.

Inspector C.H. Howard came in 1883, was horrified by people starving in the midst of plenty (He remarked that he’d never seen actual starving people before.), and recommended that Young get out before he was attacked. All the reports were written out and sent east for processing but nothing happened. By now the transporters weren’t getting paid, in an effort to force reform, and therefore threw up all sorts of problems and claims, like sending inedible food. They had a monopoly so there was no recourse.

Reuben Allan replaced Young, spending a month in Helena lobbying for reform. He went through Territorial Governor Crosby to advise the Interior Department of the starvation conditions. Young became a scapegoat and whites began to worry about attacks, but Captain Moale from Fort Shaw said “the idea of those poor starved and unarmed wretches going on the warpath” was laughable. No food was sent that summer. The people were eating the bark off the cottonwoods.

Part Three: The Open Range, 1884-86

The Canadian Pacific Railroad had extended its line to the Pacific Coast and the whole of the American northwest had become accustomed to driving their livestock up there for shipment. They paid no fees, bothered with no permits, and didn’t even note the boundaries of the reservation on maps.

Allen hired his daughter to teach, contracted with T.C. Power and Asel Kyes for provisions which were -- as usual -- substandard, and required the Blackfeet to work to earn the rations they were already entitled to receive. Inspector Barr said much of the work was for the benefit of Allen’s family. The newest woe came from mining, esp. in the Sweetgrass Hills. (One of the three buttes is called “Gold Butte” after the mine there and mining interests still want to do heap leach mining, eventually grinding up the whole butte.) Allen was supposed to evict all the miners but either couldn’t or wouldn’t.

In 1885 several companies began to cut Blackfeet timber without permission. When Allen was asked whether the cattlemen could be evicted, his reply amounted to “it’s too scary!” He had developed a drinking problem and the schools were nonfunctional.

The next agent was Mark Baldwin, a product of the Ohio “machine” that produced Warren Harding. Baldwin immediately recarpeted his office and billed the government for his travel to the rez. Drought had driven even more cattle onto Blackfeet land. The miners were hauling off ore daily. The cattlemen demanded access because “the Indians aren’t using the grazing.”

James Hill was becoming interested in stopping the traffic to Canada because of building his own railroad on the American side. There began to be talk of just closing the Blackfeet Reservation and moving the Indians to the Dakotas. In 1886-87 an exceptionally devastating winter killed the majority of cattle and ended the open range. This is the source of the famous “Last of the 500” Charlie Russell drew.

CHAPTER III, “In the Clutches of the Agency Ring” -- 1887 - 1893
(This chapter is 63 pages long and has 184 footnotes.)


George Bird Grinnell is meddling in Blackfeet affairs by now with consequences both good and bad. Mark Baldwin’s corruption was described by Grinnell in the New York Times and a scathing series of letters to the Indian Office. Yet Baldwin kept his fingers in the pie through his relationship with James J. Hill and actually offered to work for the tribe in 1907 as their claims attorney.

John B. Catlin (not a relation to the artist, I THINK, but might be) served only fifteen months from the summer of 1889 to the fall of the next year. He’s famous for helping to sell the Indians some cheap “pinchbeck” jewelry.

(Wikipedia: Pinchbeck is a form of brass, an alloy of copper and zinc mixed in proportions so that it closely resembles gold in appearance. Invented in the 1700's by Christopher Pinchbeck, a London clockmaker, it was intended as a cheaper substitute for gold used in ornamentation. However in time it came to mean a cheap and tawdry imitation of gold. )

The notorious George Steell served between 1890 - 1893. A mountain up behind Heart Butte is named for him, at least part of him: Major Steell’s Back Mountain. His daughter married a Heart Butte woman. The agency physician certified Steell as a morphine addict. His other idiosyncracy was that he wouldn’t talk to the Indians under his care except through a little door in the top of his office door. Somehow he had the sympathies of Grinnell, who had access to the high-status idealistic “Friends of the Indian” back east. When Steell’s time for firing came, Grinnell prevented the candidate of Marcus Daly and James J. Hill from being hired. He was a 24 year old, so much of their argument addressed his youth.

The next agent, Captain Lorenzo Cooke, an army man, disliked Indians. The same corruptions continued: conspiracy to end the reservation, trespassing livestock, illegal mining, and so on.

Part One: “He Ought to Be Removed” Baldwin, 1886 - 1889

1886-1887 was the year that ended the open range. The NW Treaty Commissioners arrived at the Agency from Sun River after a sixteen day struggle through two feet of snow and sub-zero weather. The tribe offered to sell the Sweetgrass Hills for three million dollars, but were told $150,000 per year for ten years -- take it or leave it. Today’s boundaries were set at that time.

Baldwin’s records are a mess, but others also seemed confused. Thirty wagons of supplies, one of the few provisioning loads that got through, arrived at the agency without any record at T.C. Power’s about who sent them. In the summer of 1887 many employees left the Agency at the same time a wave of Blood and Cree Canadians arrived. By now the cattle herds were not just drifting over the reservation boundaries but “accidentally” crossing into Canada.

The Blackfeet themselves were building log cabins, wearing “citizen’s dress” (poor versions of suits), and trying to salvage hides from the prairie heaped with bodies of winterkilled cattle. Baldwin’s eleven-year-old daughter died in spite of the efforts of the Agency physician, who had no reference books. Baldwin begged for a “few standard medical works.” The first stage of an abiding and ferocious war between superintendent of the reservation and superintendent of the schools opened up and continued over the years even after personnel changed. While the white cows wandered onto the reservation, the Agency cows mysteriously wandered off.

Benton, based on river transportation, now began to collapse as the railroads moved in. Ford, the Conrads, Floweree, Power, Hauser, and Kohrs regrouped in Great Falls and Helena. Their maps continued to identify the reservation as “stock range.” In 1888 Joe Kipp became the licensed Trader at the Agency. As before, provisions failed to arrive as soon as the weather turned harsh. All the accusations are repetitious, but each is documented by research into original records.

Grinnell, aided by Gould and J.W. Schultz, went after Baldwin in his “Field and Stream” magazine as well as in lectures and letters. Eagle Flag, White Calf, and others protested to the government in vivid rhetoric, to no avail. Bannister and Armstrong were sent to inspect but merely skimmed the surface. Armstrong said the school was a disgrace, but it wasn’t Baldwin’s fault. Washington Dems/Repubs tug-o-wars were affecting all this.

Part Two: John B. Catlin, 1889-1890

Catlin, heaping blame on Baldwin, didn’t do much better, immediately replacing the Agency farmer with his own brother, Pope Catlin. In August of 1889, Inspector William Junkin found the buildings decrepit, the people polygamous and the Indian court “unjust and ridiculous.” The rez was overrun by Canadian Indians and the system of making people earn their own commodities was in place. Junkin said no farm machinery could be issued until there was shelter for it, but Catlin had just fired the Agency carpenter, so he could hire his brother-in-law. School superintendent Coe reported the school continued to be a disaster, but didn’t note his own drunkenness.

In 1889 George Magee, a local Justice of the Peace (and later a familiar name on the reservation), and then C. L. Bristol (a former Agency trader) notified the Indian office that conditions were intolerable. By now even Joe Kipp was complaining and Bud Allison, Dan Floweree’s foreman, was confidentially testifying to abuses. Whiskey trading was again rampant.

Inspector James H. Cisney arrived in response. He noted that the Indians despaired, the cattle were mismanaged and (THIS IS THE FIRST MENTION by Foley) farming here could not succeed without irrigation.

This seems also to be the beginning of corruption over federal construction. Kipp was dinged for using the agency sawmill to cut lumber for the Holy Family Mission School on Two Medicine and then crowded out of the contract for the Agency boarding school on Cut Bank Creek. (It went to a friend of T.C. Power.) Somehow Catlin “forgot” to tell the Indian office that the Great Northern Railroad was on the reservation plotting out the proposed track. Bear Chief complained that white men were cutting Indian hay and selling it to the railroad men for their teams. The railroad spokesperson expressed regret at giving offense, offered some payment, and went right on with the work.


Part Three: The Morphine Eater: Agent George Steell, 1890-1893

Steell came to Montana in 1857 as a freighter associated with Broadwater, Power, and so on. He requested that the sub-contracting crews of white men who took hay and timber from the reservation and sold it to the railroad ought to pay the tribe. He was told that the railroad and all its needs were covered by executive order. Also, he went after fees for the cattle on the reservation, but was ignored.

The sawmill was last seen in the possession of Joe Kipp and couldn’t be located. Steell continued the feud with education, now represented by School Superintendent Bartlett, who said Steell was soft on Catholics and Democrats. The railroad was not only storing dynamite on the rez (against the regs) but was taking a 200-foot right-of-way rather than the official 150-feet limit.

Lt. Farnsworth was sent by the Army to see if the Wounded-Knee-type craze had developed among the Blackfeet. Farnsworth said “they will never cause any trouble as long as they have anything to eat.” He listened to all the complaints of the chiefs, but no one listened to him. However, Steell began war on the whiskey traders, except for the whiskey wagons that supplied the railroad workers. This effort to make the rez sober was part of Grinnell’s fondness for Steell. Earlier efforts at irrigation had been neglected and had collapsed, which Steell admitted. Inspector Cisney and he seemed to agree that farming was a bust -- that cattle were the way to go. In fact, Steell ran his own herd on the reservation with an Agency employee watching out for them. 323 acres were supposed to be farmed, but the crops failed again this year. There were not enough mowers and rakes to harvest the amount of hay available.

Alex Johnson, who crowded out Joe Kipp’s bid to build the boarding school, completed the building but it was so shoddy (according to the judgment of Lt. John Beacon) that it would probably not withstand Montana weather and had to be repaired with Agency funds and labor. By now Johnson also had the beef contract.

Dr. John E. Jenkins charged that Steell’s addiction made him no longer fit to run the Agency, so Benjamin Miller came to inspect. John Beacon assisted. Jenkins was not shaken in his conviction, but no one else backed him up. Steell sat in on interviews.

In 1891 Steell allowed the Blackfeet to travel to Washington, D.C., with their complaints. Joe Kipp went as interpreter and White Calf was spokesman. He asked to “lock up” the reservation to keep the cattle trespassers out and the tribal herd in. Bear Chief sent a letter listing complaints. Little Plume confirmed the abuses. Acting Commissioner R.V. Belt said the trespassing cattle were wrong and should be kept off, but nothing happened. The railroad said, “Oops,” and paid some money.

In April of 1892 Steell began a bridge over the Two Medicine River in order to move the Agency to Browning. He solved the ethical problem of paying the Indians with the rations they were entitled to by simply not paying them. This was not popular. A letter of complaint was sent by White Calf, Bear Chief, Tail Feathers-Over-the-Hill, Mountain Chief and others, including George Magee. They asked for the removal of Steell, the Chief Clerk, School Superintendent Robinson, and Aubrey (the agency farmer, an ancestor of Mae Williamson, first woman on the Tribal Council).

Inspectors Parker and Gardner confirmed the complaints. Gardner was an old buddy of Steell’s, so he went a little easier. He said that the reason for Steell’s little speakeasy-type door was that the Indians smoked something noxious and offensive. (??!! Schultz was evidently a marijuana user, but would that be grown locally? Does he mean kinnikinnick?) By now there were flocks of sheep trespassing. One sheep owner offered to pay grazing fees, but Steell ignored his letter. Beef didn’t arrive, a June frost killed the crops, and the school was already falling apart.

Behind the scenes, Baldwin was talking to James Hill about major coal deposits on the reservation but, alas, not on the railroad right-of-way. E.C. Garrett, Steel’s Chief Clerk, had also been doing a little prospecting. The idea was to abolish the reservation, but Garrett felt they would not willingly go to the Dakotas as “they are much attached to their country and homes.” Plots formed to remove just the part with the minerals on the east strip.

But Steell’s biggest problem was political. Grinnell and his allies defended him to the feds including Dem Grover Cleveland. Paris Gibson came into the argument on the Dem side. Schultz and the Piegan themselves argued for the retention of Steell, a known evil rather than an unknown one. Finally, Steell was forced out and wrote a letter recommending a lot of things he ought to have done himself, including issuing more wagons as “a great factor in the civilization of the Indians.”

Part Four: Captain Cooke, 1893

It was Cooke who finally moved the agency to Browning (which proved many decades later to be a poor choice: a flood plain that had to be drained, it had insufficient high-quality water to support the 21st century population). He declared his intention to visit every Indian family and requested funding for military-type camps on the way, since he doubted he would be offered hospitality or that he would enjoy it anyway. He cancelled Steell’s order for wagons. He also condemned the Willow Creek Irrigation survey as wasted money.

Inspector Province McCormick arrived in September, 1893, and noted the trespassing cattle herds. He also recommended the firing of people he identified as members of an “Agency ring.” Cooke didn’t take his advice. People were still being paid with their own commodities and the school continued to fall apart.

Cooke took out newspaper ads warning of penalties for cattle trespass and whiskey peddling. He described the very nice two-story house he wanted built for himself at the new Agency Square in Browning, which was laid out as though for cavalry horse drill. It was Cooke who notoriously threatened to jail any Indian women who did bead work. (White female clothing of the time, notably the mourning black of Queen Victoria, was laden with jet beads.)

Nothing much changed.


CHAPTER IV Rise and Decline of the Blackfeet Cattle Industry 1894-1899

As the century ended, there was a scramble for the profitable job of Blackfeet Reservation Agent. The tribe itself did not profit. Strangely it was Steell who managed to return.

Quote: “Irrigation proved to be an expensive failure. The thousands of dollars expended by Cooke on the Willow Creek system were declared a waste by Agent Steell, and Steell’s expenditures of thousands of dollar more to repair the system and add others were declared an equal waste of funds by 1899. According to one inspector, the only successful irrigation done on the reservation were the short ditches built by the Indians off the natural creeks which flowed through the reservation.” Married couples sometimes dug these by hand.

Everyone was hypnotised by minerals, esp. gold. Grinnell, having finally soured on Steell, was advocating cattle reform (the tribal herd had declined from 20,000 to fewer than 9,000), but helped in the removal of the “mineral strip” from the reservation. (If you look at a map that shows oil wells and check the east boundary, you’ll see that area just off the reservation.)

Part One: Lorenzo Cooke, acting agent, 1893-1895.

The last chapter already noted that Cooke was warned about the “agency ring,” and responded by replacing those persons with his own family and friends (His son, Ervin, and Chief Clerk Garrett) and continuing the same practices. In fact, his “guestimate” of the cattle numbers is 6,000 head while over 2,800 additional cattle belonged to white men married to Blackfeet women, which he refers to as “squaw men.” The sawmill, weathered and unusable, was still down at the Holy Family mission. Smallpox was back. Cooke asked for 10,000 rounds of small ammunition for exterminating the packs of dogs.

Birch Creek changed its course and some off-rez persons decided this changed the rez boundaries and moved onto the new 600 acres of hay land. One of the border ranchers was George Steell.

Cooke’s reports and his requests didn’t match. While he constantly reported lack of success and the inappropriateness of farming, he asked for more farmers to teach the Indians how to grow crops and more money for irrigation systems. He complained of the shoddiness of all construction done by Johnson, and yet asked for more money to more buildiings with Johnson as contractor. He complained of trespassing herds of thousands of cattle belonging to whites and also of the constant rustling of the Indian herds. All the time he was secretly prospecting in the mountains.

Inspector Thomas Smith, nephew of the Secretary of the Interior Hoke Smith, was sent and recommended more money for both farming and cattle but increased authority over half-breeds and “Squaw men.” He noted that the people hated Cooke. The Indian Office fired Cooke’s son and Garrett, so Cooke fired Richard Sanderville, Assistant Clerk, and gave that job to his son. On his way out, he threw many “half-breeds and Squaw men” off the reservation, including J.W. Schultz.

Cooke “successfully pressed for funds to begin a major irrigation canal on Two Medicine Creek in November of 1894. After he received the funds, he reported that the work had to be suspended because of inclement weather.” (This project would probably have benefitted the Holy Family Mission farm.) The annuity winter clothing didn’t arrive.

Mineral rights became a war of “pots and kettles” involving Cooke who filed 27 claims in Flathead County to avoid saying they were on the rez, Joe Kipp who filed his in Teton County, Henry Kennerly, Henry Norris, Grinnell, Schultz.

Still recommending cattle expansion, Cooke claimed that if irrigation (which he had been pursuing with the old practice of Indian labor paid with their own commodities) would mean that Indians would be self-supporting in five years if “made to farm.”

PART TWO: Ceding the Mineral Strip, 1894-1895

In 1894 Schultz, now partnering with E.C. Garrett (Chief Clerk at the Agency), Joe Kipp (Agency trader), and W.H. Morrell, asked Indian Commissioner Browning to arrange the opening of the reservation where the assays looked good. J.J. Hill was also involved. They hinted that a military presence would be required to keep prospectors out otherwise. Grinnell was opposed. He also criticized the loss of timber that would be involved.

Cooke asked the Canadian RCMP to help keep prospectors out, but one of the parties they stopped included J.J. Holbrook and Charles Aubrey, rez personalities. They claimed they were just on their way through to the Flathead. Cooke requisitioned a lot of miner’s shovels and picks, claiming thaqt they were for digging irrigation canals.

The Piegan began to consider selling “the mineral strip” and enlisted as their advisors Joe Kipp, George Steell, Charles Conrad, and A. B. Hamilton (a nephew of I. G. Baker and co-founder of Fort Whoop-up) -- all people of compromised backgrounds. The government’s commissioners were William Pollock, George B. Grinnell, and Walter Clements. Little Dog was spokesman. There was not just a difference in money offered, but also in the amount of land involved. There was a split among the Indians, with the full-bloods more willing to sell. The names mentioned in the report are White Calf, Little Bear Chief, Three Suns, Four Horns, Tearing Lodge, and Horace Clarke -- son of Malcolm Clarke whose death triggered the Baker Massacre. The men were very eloquent and the report quotes them at some length. It was Horace Clarke who asked why the government didn’t just help the Indians develop the minerals themselves. After two days the price was reduced, but they were haggling over a payment in lieu of compound interest. Little Bear Chief said, “A snake has crawled into our councils.” Foley thinks that was probably Conrad, who had a lot of side deals that were secret from the Indians.

Commissioner Pollock reported afterwards that the land was suitable only for grazing and that the Dawes Act Allotment should be postponed, leaving the land as a “communal grazing tract.”

Part Three: George Steell, Cattle Baron. 1895-1897

As soon as Steell was installed, he was attacked. By now he had cast off his Indian wife and half-breed children. His explanation was that his wife was adulterous and he said he had spent $10,000 on the education of his children. His ranch was now in Dupuyer, close to Heart Butte.

Quote: “Steell was openly critical of Cooke’s irrigation systems, considering the Willow Creek project a failure. Steell’s own irrigation engineer, Ross Cartee, insisted that additional funds were required to make repairs at Willow Creek and to complete the canal at Two Medicine Creek initiated by Cooke and McIntyre. Inspector Province McCormick supported Steele and Cartee’s assessment of Cooke’s failure at irrigation. He repeated his warning that Cooke’s reports describing the Reservation irrigation systems were false: they existed ‘only on paper.’" McCormick agreed that small irrigation ditches would help the Indians develop their hay crops for cattle, but estimated that the total irrigation of the Reservation would cost no more than $30,000 to $40,000. He specifically opposed continuation of an irrigation engineer on an annual salary, and added that the bridge Cooke had constructed over Two Medicine Creek “would wash away in the first storm.” He added that Blackfeet were an “intelligent, well-behaved, easily controlled” people who never wanted any army officers in charge again.

Browning’s location in a swamp would neither accept sewage nor yield wells, but had wind “about 9 days in the week” reported one inspector. The buildings were disintegrating as their foundations settled unevenly into the muck. Only 23 individuals were benefiting from irrigation, 13 of them whites married to Indians and including J. W. Schultz. Frost wiped out the crops. Steell arrested and jailed Tom Dawson for branding a “slick” calf and for holding a private “dance” without permission. Since he was married to Malcolm Clarke’s well-connected daughter, he was able to bring Helena political wrath on Steell.

During Cooke’s reign, the traders were Kipp, Henry Kennerly and James McKnight, all of whom had violated regulations. Kennerly and McKnight left with Cooke. R. L. McGonical, one of Kipp’s employees, then opened a new post. (This was the third, counting the one at Blackfoot, I guess.) But Inspector McCormick caught on and exposed the ruse. He also said the Blackfeet were “active, intelligent, progressive people, anxious to learn and follow the ways of the whites. They are an unusually polite and sociable people.” More cattle were being sent but they were in poor shape. There wasn’t enough hay due to the shortage of cutting machinery, though Steell’s expenditures were twice what Cooke had spent. Many of the critics, finaglers, politicians and meddlers seemed to be based in Kalispell where Conrad had built his mansion.

Hamilton set up as a trader but was revealed as another Kipp front when Hamilton’s creditors tried to attach the goods in payment for Hamilton’s debts -- then Kipp revealed himself as the true owner. It turned out that the required army monitoring of beef issuance had not been observed for eight years. Many other operations were deceitfully described, for instance, Steell said the Indians were “not permitted to handle the cattle,” but in fact they were required to do all the work -- just not permitted to do the branding, which was done by agency people to suit themselves. (There were over 500 Blackfeet brands.)

A major party shift in Washington, D.C., put Senator Thomas Carter into power. He proposed George B. McLaughlin, former editor of the “Benton River Press” and then sheriff of Chouteau County, be the new agent -- though McLaughlin had requested the position of consul in Hawaii. (He was aging and frail.) The issue of fencing the rez now came up. A new scandal erupted over cattle: instead of butchering the usual 25 head a week, Steell butchered 130 head (evidently because they were in danger of dying anyway) and tried to store the meat. But the weather warmed and the meat rotted. Instead of discarding it and slaughtering more beef, Steell issued the spoiled meat.

By the time Steell left, J. H. Sherburne and Joe Kipp were the two traders on the rez. Steell arranged for all unbranded cattle and four or five hundred cords of wood to be taken to a point on the rez just across Birch Creek from his Dupuyer ranch.


PART FOUR: Senator Carter’s Friends and the Blackfeet, 1897-1899

George McLaughlin had a lot on his desk. The Agency physician was out of drugs. Steell had the new beef commodity contract. The buildings were still falling down and the rustlers were at work. Special Agent Hawley insisted that McLaughlin fire employees, substituting friends of Hawley. McLaughlin brought in as issue clerk “Malcolm” Clarke (probably Horace) who had just graduated from Carlisle. Hawley had some other sneaky deals going with Steell, who was living with the agency butcher’s family in his own room. There are implications that this had to do with his relationship with Mrs. Cook, Cook being the slightly disconcerting name of the butcher. At some point Hawley went too far and was fired.

The same problems persisted: bad lumber, cattle swindles, and so on. Now a new problem was that there were 20,000 cows but competing with them for grass were 10,000 horses. The inspector complained that the Indians thought “a $15 horse is of greater intrinsic worth than a $35 steer.” Grinnell weighed in with the Indians’ request to operate the rez as a communal grazing ground and pointed out that he had known the people since they were living off the buffalo. He suggested a full-time “outfit” with a good range foreman and a rotating Indian crew, thus educating them about proper practises. He thought they should brand their own herds.

Thomas Fuller, former mayor of Helena, “staunch Republican, Civil War hero and failed businessman” (destroyed by a labor boycott, they say), replaced the easily discouraged McLaughlin. Probably the last straw was NOT the burning down of the boys’ dorm at the boarding school since it was a worthless building anyway. Steell left for Alaska without being able to explain what happened to thirty yards of red carpeting.

It was Fuller who denied funds for a building to house a “Red Man’s Literary Society” for grads of Carlisle and other schools, on grounds that they would be up to no good and were unreliable and untrustworthy.

Bear Chief and other leaders requested again that the rez be fenced to keep the cattle separated in their proper places. Fuller called Bear Chief “a dissipated minor chief” and sighed that last time he asked for a brass band. Fuller complained that the cattle trespassers were not as much trouble as the whiskey traders and said cowboys would just cut any fence anyway. Fuller’s statistics showed 2,022 Piegans on 1,500,000 acres of land with 10,000 cows and 20,000 horses.

Grinnell was called to testify to the Indian Commissioner and gave his opinion, now being persuaded to the usefulness of a fence. He advocated Indian preference hiring for as many jobs as possible. He had an idea for a “bull yard” where they could be managed for maximizing calves. Nothing he recommended was done, except the bull yard, which was put in a place which was snowed under and inaccessible all winter. Thomas Fuller had the ultimate response: he died. At about the same time fifty of the bulls died, starved and buried under snowdrifts.

Special Agent Elisha B. Reynolds was pulled in as interim superintendent. He documented the usual atrocities, plus criticizing the Great Northern Railroad which was abusing the right-of-way by changing their route without permission. Reynolds urged a fence with range riders’ stations and stables at intervals to manage gates.

The next agent was Logan, a Texas cattleman. He recommended irrigation -- not for farming but for grazing. Inspector Graves reported in September of 1899: “During the past two yars there have been given to the Agents... nearly five thousand dollars to expend for irrigation; but, I regret to say, that so far as accomplishing anything of real benefit to the Blackfeet Indians in the way of giving better irrigation facilities, this money has been practically wasted.” Graves added he found “a manifest lack of judgment and proper consideration of the subject” of irrigation. “He described one fourteen-mile canal which provided no water to any farms.” He thought it would be possible to develop irrigation, but that should be done in a systematic manner and warned that money was simply being wasted.

Logan said, “The Indian is a natural beggar and bummer, and if they were in possession of the earth and all things on it, they would still beg for more.” He resigned early in 1900, but he hadn’t been around much anyway.

Chapter V: 1900 - 1910 “A White Man’s Pasture”: The Blackfeet Get Fenced, 1900-1910
(There are 111 pages in Foley’s chapter, with 232 supporting footnotes.)

Old White Calf, the last traditional chief, died in 1903. James H. Monteath, former managing editor of the “Butte Inter-Mountain” newspaper, was the new agent and he lasted five years. The cattle fence was erected as the old Indians had asked, but a permit system was inaugurated that let thousands of cattle inside the fence anyway. Monteath, once again, tried to make the people into farmers, saying, “With proper management [this tribe] can be made self-supporting in a very few years.”

PART ONE: The “New Policy” and the Old Problems”, 1900-1905

Commissioner Jones and Monteath abandoned cattle as the road to prosperity (after all, whites with permits were eating all the grass) and turned back to agricultural irrigation. The headline in the Great Falls Tribune on September, 1902, was “PIEGAN INDIANS IN OPEN REVOLT.” Monteath threatened to jail the aged White Calf. Little Dog, never a pacifist, threatened in return to “bind [Monteath] with ropes and throw him ahead of the next passing train.” Grinnell wrote his usual outraged letters with no effect. The railroad claimed it had no duty to obey the law that required railroads to be fenced, since it was on the reservation, so the trains continued to kill cattle. Even Monteath was upset over that. (Today the struggle is to fence the highways since the cattle wander onto the road where people smash into them.)

By now water rights were an issue. The Blackfeet, with reason, were afraid the government would settle them by abolishing the reservation. The Indian cattle were down to 6,000 head, with six whites married to Indians owning two-thirds of them. Monteath was wary of the powerful white ranchers around the rez. When the Indian Service asked why he was not prosecuting trespassers, Monteath pointed out that the cases would go before juries of white cattlemen.

In regard to irrigation, Monteath said: “A considerable amount of time and money has been spent upon irrigating ditches in different parts of the reservation. I find but few of them in a state of repair, while many are simply monuments of mis-directed energy, being utterly impracticable. There is much need of intelligent, scientific help on this subject... The failure of some of these ditches has wrought incalcuable injury, and... we are sadly in need of professional assistance and direction.

“I find the hay meadows (native grasses) growing less and less productive each year, and while the range is the best in this part of the country and abundantly ample for all present needs, it would seem the part of wisdom to start now a system of irrigation which would assure us crops of hay and feed for the future.”

Monteath’s revised statistics listed 10,000 cattle, 22,000 horses, a human population of 2,085, with a total of 50 births and “only” 33 deaths. For a long time earlier the deaths had outnumbered the births. Mike Connelly, one of the trespassing cattlemen, asked to put 200 cows on the rez and got his permit. The higher authorities wanted to move the Agency Farmer, a man named Peter, but Monteath objected because “two or three train loads of cattle have just been unloaded east of the reservation and are headed this way.”

Willow Creek School was physically collapsing and action was begun to build a replacement on Cut Bank Creek. Rations were being reduced before the people could get gardens planted or cattle to the point of having extra. In 1901 smallpox showed up on the Flathead reservation and leaked over to the Blackfeet. The jail and school were unsanitary messes, but Dr. Martin, the Agency physician since 1891, said they just didn’t have the money for improvements, or even proper disinfectants. It was in this time period that the scandal broke of confining defiant students in a meat locker with holes for air or the often-flooded cellar of Willow Creek School where drowned rodents floated around among decayed vegetables. Inspector McConnell’s reports noted this but nothing happened. Steell picked up on all the complaints and suggested that he be rehired.

Commissioner Jones wanted the Indians to cut their hair and wanted to eliminate both rations and the reservation which he thought encouraged prejudice. Monteath counted on his ration rolls 63 white men with 295 Indian women and children dependent; 21 “part bloods” with 481 dependents; and 885 full blood family members. He said he would be happy to eliminate rations, except that there was no work available to replace them. He suggested irrigation.

“But before this is done it will be necessary that some competent, responsible person formulate a system. Too much money and labor have already been wasted on impracticable and expensive irrigation work... However, ways to accomplish the desired end will naturally suggest themselves to the man who wants to accomplish the end, and, I doubt not, that I will find a way. If it is deemed best to reward work for merely personal improvement. There is a great need, however, that some extensive irrigation work be inaugurated here. The native grass bottoms are commencing to run out as the result of annual cutting.”

The tribe at this point had no body of representation. Nevertheless, some of the leaders requested the abandonment of Willow Creek School, money for irrigation ditches, and a quarterly cash payment so each could “improve his home and live.” They asked to go to Washington, D.C., to make their case.

Monteath blatantly curried favor with Jones, his boss. They stone-walled the school problem, though Inspector Jenkins said if they didn’t close it down and send the students home they were likely to get typhoid. Then Monteath did an about-face on irrigation, saying that Ross Cartee, the same civil engineer he had reviled, had converted him to the idea of major development which would “be paid in cash from Treaty funds.” Anyone who wouldn’t work would be branded an “idler” and Monteath suggested “it might be necessary to start a chain gang.” “Let stock-raising be a side issue.” He wanted the cattle removed from the Indians in spring and returned to them only after they had been good farmers all summer. He wanted them living close together where they could be supervised daily. Any who disagreed could get off the reservation. But he exempted “progressive half-breeds” from all this.

Monteath disliked Inspector McConnell, a former Governor of Idaho, and tried to get rid of him by claiming that he had extorted the Agency traders for money so their licenses wouldn’t be revoked. Nevertheless, McConnell’s accusations about the schools and the prevalence of tuberculosis appeared in the Great Falls Tribune on February 26, 1902. Monteath was called to Washington, D.C., for consultation and while there a Washington Post interview with him reported everything was fine except that the Indians were “vanishing,” down from 7,000 to 2,100. He claimed that so many had “intermarried” that they were “weaklings.” His formal report to Jones was quite opposite.

Another scandal broke on the Crow Agency over bribes and the Blackfeet managers were peripherally involved.

Monteath wanted to devote all money, even that needed by the schools, to the irrigation project. In May, 1902, he pointed out that “even if major irrigation work was initiated during the summer, it would be over a year before the Indians had harvested their first crop. “ He requested $33,000 for irrigation, which the Indian Office reduced to $5,000.

Now he began to think about water rights, “as there were an increasing number of requests, proposals and attempts by neighboring settlers and white men to use the reservation water resources for off-reservation irrigation projects." Ironically, this was a flood year and the irrigation engineer was kept busy rebuilding the many washed-out bridges.

Grinnell’s second-guess was that Monteath was trying to get the Blackfeet herded up closer to the mountains so the flats could be leased to ranchers. At another point Monteath suggested that all the half-breeds be put off onto one section of the reservation and denied all benefits and supports. (He included as enemies Joe Kipp, Mrs. Maggie Wetzel (now married to Joe Kipp) and Horace Clarke. Also his sister, Helen Clarke. In the end everything went on as before. Floweree grazed his cattle on the rez, Monteath put out large sums for irrigation, and the rez fence was started.

In 1904 the crops, except hay, failed again. The irrigation system wasn’t finished. Monteath opposed the new council (which included Joe Kipp and Horace Clarke), which begged the government for a cattle issue. He hired T.E. Price, who had already been fired for incompetence twice before, to be his irrigation expert.

“Inspector W.H. Code conducted his examination of the irrigation project during July of 1903. Monteath provided him with an explanation of his reason for selecting the Cut Bank Creek project and admitted that once rations were cut off, ‘Irrigation work seemed the only work available.’ Cut Bank was selected because of cheaper cost estimates ($35,000, Monteath claimed, as opposed to the $100,000 project estimate for the Carlow Bench ditch.) Monteath also admitted that he had tried, but failed, to get Mr. Fortier of the Bozeman Experimental Station to examine the project. His correspondence indicates that the provision of employment, not the value or quality of the irrigation project, was his primary concern.”

Inspector Code was sceptical. Inspector Levi Chubbuck said that diversified farming was “too precarious” a venture. He advocated cattle. “Chubbuck argued for extensive irrigation, but for the purpose of developing grass for winter forage. He noted that with 20,000 head on the Reservation, there was difficulty in providing enough feed. He believed that the various creeks on the reservation would be capable of irrigating enough grass and hay land to feed 50,000 head if a ‘comprehensive’ irrigation plan was developed.”

“Both Inspector Code and Inspector Chubbuck had urged the Indian office to develop Blackfeet water resources more systematically before the Indians lost their water rights to the settlers on the border of the reservation. Instead, the Indian Office leased the Blackfeet land and inadvertently surrendered more than they intended in the process. In 1903, William Conrad, the brother of Charles Conrad and president of the Conrad Investment Company of Great Falls, sought a lease for some 2,400 acres of land along Birch Creek to permit his cattle herds access to the water without trespassing on the reservation. Monteath claimed that no Indians lived near the area. The Blackfeet were to be permitted to fence a small area on Conrad’s side of Birch Creek to water their catte. In December of 1903, the Interior Department approved the five year lease which required Conrad to pay ten cents per acre per year; the fence he constructed was to become the property of the Tribe upon the termination of his lease. Once the lease was granted, Conrad constructed a dam on Birch Creek as part of a private canal project. Although the lease granted Conrad no such privilege, the Conrad Investment Company diverted thousands of inches of water from Birch Creek beginning in 1904.”

Samuel Slater thought the money wasn’t coming out even. “An engineer, I see, was employed to survey with a view to irrigation, but what fund is contemplated for that, and how much I am not advised.”

“Congressman Dixon appealed to Secretary Hitchcock in April on behalf of William Henry and others who wished to use the waters of Cut Bank Creek to irrigate non-reservation lands. This is only one of several parties who sought permits for the use of Reservation water resources in 1904. By the end of the year, the Conrad Investment Company had completed its dam... Despite requests from the Interior Department that the dam be taken down, Monteath reported that it was still diverting water from Birch Creek in October. The Blackfeet asked that some of the water to be diverted by the Bureau of Reclamation for the St. Mary’s Canal project be reserved for the future needs of the Reservation. However, the director of the U.S. Geological Survey informed the Indian Office that the projected canal, which could have provided ‘considerable areas’ of irrigated land for the Blackfeet, was abandoned because of the expense.”

In the summer of 1904 there was mange and, again, drought. W.H. Matson, who had struggled through ten years as Methodist missionary and Superintendent of the Agency School died before he could see the construction of the Cut Bank School well along. His replacement was Price, the screw-up engineer.

By now even the president, Teddy Roosevelt, was being advised about the corruption on the reservations. But switching from leases to permits for cattle grazing introduced enough confusion for Monteath to keep favoring Floweree while clamping down on those unimportant. Then Jones went out of office, replaced by Francis E. Leupp who brought in auditors who found many dubious deals and advances. W.C. Broadwater and his partner Simon Pepin as well as J.H. Sherburne, were closely questioned since they were accumulating cattle.

Now James Perrine comes on the scene as the conveyor of a formal petition from the Blackfeet. They protest that they thought the end of the leasing was the end of the outside cattle, which were eating their hay in the fields before it could be cut.


PART TWO: Standing Still, Going Backwards: 1905-1910

Leupp replaced Monteath with James Jensen as Acting Agent, but he was not sympathetic to Perrine’s appeal. Though he had a permit, Floweree had nearly double the number of cows he was permitted plus 650 horses. Then Charles Conrad’s estate (Chas himself having expired) claimed $30,000 in legal fees from past negotiations. A rider for this amount was attached to the Indian Appropriations bill. The Piegans objected that it was unwarranted.

Grinnell again intervened to try to render justice. The new Agent, Captain J. Z. Dare, was directed to consider it. Dare was sympathetic. “He pointed out that William Conrad’s appropriation of Birch Creek water was being contested in the courts. He admitted that the irrigation ditches needed repair, but did not believe they were entirely useless.”

Dare couldn’t figure out the permit system and was even more puzzled by the grazing tax imposed on the Blackfeet cattlemen themselves who owned the land. Inspector Arthur Tinker came in May, 1905, and thought they would do better to raise horses rather than cattle!

“Irrigation continued to be the major source of labor and income for the Blackfeet. The Indian Office provided Dare with another $15,000 to continue the Cut Bank Creek canal intiated by Monteath, but the Indians were required to fight a major forest fire in August.” Dare let Horace Clarke come back, but didn’t succeed in excluding Dan Floweree’s cows. Permits were back-dated and overlapping, producing confusion.

Inspector David Cannon came specifically to look at the ag prospects. His report was that the native grasses were so depleted by overgrazing that soon there would be nothing but “white sage” suitable only for sheep.

William Conrad pressed to open the whole reservation to white settlement. Charles Conrad’s posthumous claim was defeated by Congress but they passed another bill that would remove all water rights from the Blackfeet. It was vetoed by President Roosevelt. “The struggle between William Conrad and the Blackfeet for the waters of Birch Creek continued in the courts.” T.C. Power’s Sun River Stock and Land Company applied for grazing permits for 1,000 head.

“Although the Indian office had expended thousands of dollars upon the Cut Bank Creek Canal, few of the Indians moved to the irrigated areas as the project neared completion.” Dare said, “There is an disinclination, amounting almost to a prejudice, among the Indians in regard to taking up land upon the line of this canal. Inducements were made to Indians this spring to take up claims of 25 acres each and cultivate the land.” Few takers.

The winter of 1906-07 was another disastrous one for stock, which now had scabies. Floweree asked for a rebate on his permit.

M.D. Baldwin, former Agent fermenting in Kalispell, approached the Blackfeet to hired him to prosecute the government for old claims for land taken. This puzzled Dare, who knew of no claim. He was told there were no more claims and the Blackfeet should stop obsessing about them.

“In August of 1907, Judge Wolverton rendered a judgment in US vs. Conrad Investment Company in favor of the Blackfeet. Citing the recent ‘Winters Case’ (concerning Fort Belknap’s claims to the Milk River), Judge Wolverton enjoined Conrad from diverting the water of Birch Creek ‘... so as to impinge upon the right of the government to have flowing at all times in the stream the amount of 1,666 2/3 inches...’ The decision also permitted the United States to demand more water if its needs required it, and confirmed the power of the US to prevent trespassers from using the water recourses of the Reservation.”

In 1907 Montana passed an act requiring allotment of Blackfeet lands to individuals and the sale of unallotted “surplus” lands. The Montana whites thought this would mean a prompt release of vastly profitable lands. But it took more than a decade to untangle the water rights and mineral rights. (The more powerful and alert were angling to be alloted oil land.)

Dare left the next spring in the midst of a quarrel about whether money should have been allotted to the tribal treasury or to the federal Treasury department. Misallocation had clearly happened but couldn’t be traced or even confirmed. This was partly because of reorganization of the Department of the Interior. Slater said, “The Indian Service is disintegrating slowly to its final extinction.” (Who would argue? But it took so long!)

The next agent, James Sanders, lasted only a matter of months. By the end of 1908 the new agent was C.A. Churchill, former supervisor of Education at Fort Shaw. (We knew his daughter as Eula Sherburne, wife of J.L. Sherburne son of J.H. Sherburne.) Churchill revived (or continued) the practice of putting tribal money in his personal account, including permit fees from the Sherburne Mercantile Company.

The internal area of the reservation was supposed to have been divided into districts, but there were no fences. Churchill instituted the districts by using the watercourses as boundaries. He failed to force Floweree to not brand slicks or to have agency personnel monitor shipping. But neither could he give good answers to inquiries from the Indian Office about the acreage of his districts or why his fees were so low. His idea was to put ALL the outside cattle off for a year to let the land recover. The famous fence was falling down.

Inspector O’Fallon gave Churchill a pass, but Grinnell was critical. He said Churchill was lazy, didn’t do anything about the whisky trade, was much too easy on the agency traders who charged very high prices, and was allowing the development of a gang of juvenile delinquents.

A thorough investigation by Special Agent Edgar A. Allen revealed that Broadwater and Pepin and Sherburne, were “coding” their goods so that certain people were charged more than others. He said Churchill pressured people on behalf of the traders, acting as a collection agent. The same coding applied to the cattle used to pay bills: some people’s were worth more than others.

The constant demand for lumber had prompted Mr. Labreche to sell all his cattle in order to invest in a modern sawmill, with encouragement from Captain Dare and the Indian Office, but then the government reversed itself and forbade him to go into action. He was ruined.

Allen noted that the government dumped 150 Rocky Boy Chippewa Indians on the rez in November of 1909 with only three hours notice to the agent. They were set up in tents along Cut Bank Creek waiting for food and clothes they believed they’d been promised. No one wanted to tell them anything different.

But Allen did not have a high opinion of Churchill, whom he thought was overimpressed with his status and underaware of his obligations.



CHAPTER VI: The Office of Indian Affairs vs. The Blackfeet Tribe 1910-1930

(This chapter of the Foley Report has 108 pages and 259 footnotes.)

Some say that the 19th century didn’t end on the reservation until after WWI. The 20th century came in two parts: technological progress and modern methods at one end and drought-fueled poverty at the other. For the Blackfeet there were also civil service scandals: mismanagement and embezzlement. For instance (and this was not identified as wrong) “the monumental cost and failure of the Reclamation Bureau’s irrigation projects were shifted to the Blackfeet and attached as a lien to their land patents.” Trepasses and exploitations by the Great Northern Railroad, the Conrad Investment Company (which became the Conrad-Valier Company, and the unjustified patenting of lands belonging to vulnerable Indians so they could be seized as private property, were all waved on by. Many of the old people starved to death in spite of outraged objections on the part of whites both local and national. The new structures of tribal self-government were often restricted and interfered with by the Indian Office, which was used to running everything.

PART ONE: Superintendent McFatridge, 1910-1915

McFatridge walked into the familiar troubles: failed crops, trespassing cattle, 100 to 150 Rocky Boy’s Cree who were actually being given Blackfeet allotments. Two Agency physicians resigned in the face of tuberculosis, trachoma and VD. The Methodist missionary, the Rev. R.A. Riggin, was using the Methodist lands for his private herd and owed, according to McFatridge, $1,700. The tribe and the Indian Office agreed that the Montana white ranchers should remove their cattle, but had no power to make them actually go. His additional burden was his family. Locally they were known as the father, son and Holy Terror.

The following is worth quoting entire:

“...The adverse rulings of the courts against the Conrad Investment Company’s claims to the waters of Birch Creek had threatened the company’s stockholders along with the settlers south of the Reservation. However, when the stockholders asked the government to permit them to continue to divert water from Birch Creek for the canal system constructed earlier, the Indian Office ignored the recommendations of the Reclamation Engineer and granted the request. Commissioner Valentine recognized tht the government had an obligation to protect the water rights of the Blackfeet, but he suggested that the Indians might also learn to live in harmony with their neighbors:

“ ‘...it is a cardinal, perhaps the cardinal principle of the Indian Office that Indians in the future will have to live and should live as neighbors among the white men and any proposition which considers merely the benefit of the Indians alone from a wholly selfish Indian point of view may, in the end, have the very worst effect on the interests of the Indians, psychologically and sociologically speaking, if not legally and economically speaking.

“ ‘And from that point of view... even if its cost we will suppose $3 more an acre to construct [irrigation projects] from the Badger than it would ... from the Birch Creek... it might be good business for the Government to spend more money in irrigating the reservation land than to put itself in the position of hogging Birch Creek... although at a greater cost per acre.’

“As Valentine’s memorandum suggested, this decision connected with an inquiry by Senator Dixon; it seems the Indian Office wanted to live in harmony with Congress. Unfortunately, the Conrad-Valier Water Company persistently failed to allow enough water for the irrigation of 7,000 acres of Reservation land, and the added costs of developing Badger Creek were indirectly thrust upon the Blackfeet -- not the government. The Interior Department ignored these possibilities, and reduced Engineer Savage’s filings for water rights as requested by the Company. The only time the Birch Creek water reached the Reservation was when the Company dam was broken or being repaired, but for the most part, as McFatridge warned, the Company diverted “practically all the water” from Birch Creek in violation of its agreement.

“The issues of water rights and irrigation projects illustrate the gap between the goals of the Indian Office and the reality of Blackfeet life. Clearly, the Indian Office intended that irrigation would by used by the Blackfeet for farming, thus justifying the government’s decision to affix the extensive costs of the Reclamation Service projects as a lien upon the allotted lands of the Indians. The vast sums spent on irrigation provided employment for some Blackfeet but conferred no long-term benefits on the Indians. Most members of the Tribe selected grazing lands as their allotments, and except for their small gardens, very few of the Blackfeet were interested in farming because it was always a dismal failure at the Reservation. They were stockmen, in their estimate, and their Reservation was grazing country, not farm land. The Indians’ only sustained effort at cultivation was in developing their hay lands. Despite this, the Indian Office persisted in its irrigation projects, and McFatridge renewed the Agency “demonstration” farm,” even while reporting that the Blackfeet studiously ignored such “models” of civilization. It was to be long after they received their allotments before the majority of Blackfeet realized that hundreds of thousands of dollars expended on the irrigation projects was not a government relief program or even a generous gratuity, but a monumental boondoggle.”

The Great Northern Railway Company had all charges for feeder roads, timber and gravel waived. There was nominal payment for a telephone line. Land for the hotels and their grounds were sold for a reduced price.

“The complexity of leasing permits and the distribution of revenues to individual Indians” were insoluble by McFatridge and remain to be resolved in court by the Cobell lawsuit.

Supervisor Fred Baker, who had thought McFatridge was doing all right in 1911, became concerned at the mess in 1912, including the fact that McFatridge assigned his wife and son to whatever jobs were open. Everyone hated Clara, the “Holy Terror,” who interfered with her husband’s official mail, adding her own semi-literate remarks! In fact, Baker thought the Rocky Boys’ people should be given Ft. Assiniboine’s military reservation, as much to save them as to relieve the resentment of the Blackfeet.

Robert J. Hamilton, “a half-breed Piegan who took the name of A.B. Hamilton, the old Fort Whoop Up whiskey trader who adopted him,” now became a strong voice on behalf of the old starving full-bloods. He said, “It is our belief that the Lord never intended this man for an Indian Agent.” McFatridge denied that any more old-timers were dying than usual.

Another McFatridge opponent was S.A. Selecman, principal of what was now the Browning Public School, under the authority of the state rather than the Indian Agent. He gave the son, Leslie, a whipping, and could not be fired by McFatridge, who did what he could to make Selecman’s life miserable. The latter retaliated with letters accusing the former of being a “Republican blood-sucker.”

Hamilton finally went to Washington, D.C., with his complaints. Commissioner Sells sent Supervisor Lipps with instructions not to let anyone know he was coming and not to stay with the agent. Lipps reported that McFatridge wasn’t the best, but Hamilton was a local horse thief, unrespected. Baker was brushed off as over-idealistic. A later Chief Inspector recommended that McFatridge be demoted to a job within his abilities.

McFatridge’s delegation at a tribal meeting included James Perrine, Levi Burd, Malcolm Clarke, and Charles Buck -- the most prosperous of the mixed bloods. They informed the Commissioner that the Blackfeet only wanted to sell part of their unallotted land. McFatridge arranged a meeting between these men and the Commercial Club of Cut Bank, Montana, who wanted to buy the Browning townsite. This same group approved the first of the oil leases for exploration in the NE part of the reservation.

“In January of 1914, Charles Davis, Supervisor of Farming At Large for the Indian Office, charged that after all of the irrigation work at the Blackfeet Reservation there was not a single irrigated acre under cultivation.” McFatridge’s defense was that the farm machinery didn’t arrive until too late to plant. He also pointed out that their irrigated allotments were twenty to forty miles from their grazing allotments. (It was thought fair to give each family some of each kind of land, though they were necessarily separated since the whole reservation is a long incline from mountain to prairie.)

The Secretary of Interior took the unprecedented step of asking the Indians what they needed. James Perrine, Secretary of the Tribal council responded: “...put a stop to the useless expenditure of thousands upon thousands of dollars of our money on the construction by the Reclamation Service of irrigating canals, etc. in the endeavor to make farmers out of a people who have no desire or inclination to become such, who are not fitted for it by nature and who were never consulted about their wishes in the matter, but have always been treated by the government as children, who had no well-defined ideas as to what they wanted or what was good for them.”

“.. Assistant Commissioner E. B. Meritt ... recommended that if the Blackfeet were to receive “some return” on their irrigable land allotment selections, they would have to lease them to white farmers. But this hardly satisfied the Blackfeet, who finally seemed to understand, as Perrine already did, that all of the irrigation expenses were to be charged to the individual allotment.”

On the surplus lands all the previously glamorous mineral deposits were now reclassified as being “non-coal, non-oil” and of little value. Thomas Sloan, investigator, said the poverty was as severe as any he had seen and that McFatridge had little use for full-bloods.

S.M. Brosius, a Washington Agent for the Indian Rights Association, “pointed out that the Commissioner must be aware that the Reservation is utterly unfit for agriculture, and claimed that it should have been equally evident ‘...that the construction of an irrigation project was not primarily in the interest of the Indians, since their lands are suitable chiefly for grazing and th Indians themselves untrained in tilling the soil.’” He was very critical of the Walsh Bill, which was supposed to have provided money from the sale of unallotted lands, but was never implemented. He underlined the dire straits of full-bloods around Heart Butte.

Chief Inspector Linnen made a new investigation. Two other reports were sent to the Indian Office. The Report of Commission to Investigate Irrigation Projects on Indian Lands “...described the several projects on Blackfeet land and reported that in each project the amount of land irrigated was very small and the per acre expense was very high. The Commission noted that the Blackfeet were mainly stockraisers and predicted that diversified farming would never be successful, but ‘in any ordinary season a good crop of hay may be grown on the irrigable land...’ Nonetheless the Commission recommended completion of the numerous projects to a limited extent at least in order to reduce the per acre cost; they recommended that Senator Walsh’s bill be passed, thus opening up for sale the unallotted irrigable lands on the eastern edge of the Reservation; they also stated ‘it is highly essential that the Indian retain possession of his irrigable land’; and finally they recommended that the cost of irrigation be apportioned among those benefited. The Commission did not ask the Blackfeet if they wanted their lands irrigated. The report illustrated the Indian Office’s determination to make irrigation synonymous with civilization and the good of the Indian.”

The second report was by Elsie E. Newton on “moral conditions.” She was mostly shocked by sexual arrangements, including polygamy. One wonders what she would think about liberated conditions today.

On January 9, 1915, Chief Inspector Linnen and Special Agent F.S. Cook ripped McFatridge in a special report. “Linnen and Cook estimated that over $942,000 had been expended up to 1914 on irrigation, and cited the request of the Reclamation Bureau for an additional $2,000,000 for additional projects. ‘The benefits derived by the Indians from this large expenditure of money have been practically nil... As a matter of fact an Indian, or white man, would need to expend some two or three thousand dollars on each irrigable allotment ... before he could expect any returns. The Indians have not the means to do this, and... it is exceedingly doubtful whether any great amount of this land which can be irrigated, will ever be successfully farmed.”

“The Agency farmers conceded that farming was futile under the climatic conditions which prevailed.” (Constant wind, temperature extremes, alkaline soil.) There were many other matters ranging from neglect to swindling. McFatridge was out. He stole $1,200 to finance his leaving and went to Canada.

PART TWO: The Return of Corruption and Starvation, 1915 -1920.

The next superintendent was C.L. Ellis was relatively honest and saw the Rocky Boy’s Cree off to Fort Assiniboine.

“Like McFatridge, Ellis was burdened with a serious problem: the refusal of the Conrad-Valier Company to fulfill its part of the agreement reached in 1911 with the Indian Office and the Department of the Interior. Although obligated to supply sufficient wataer to irrigate at least 7,000 acres of land along Birch Creek, the Company consistently diverted all of Birch Creek at its dam for its off-reservation reservoir.” [Lake Francis?]

The fence around the reservation had been dismantled and the materials sold to individual Indians. Cattle problems revived, including the practice of traders accumulating cattle in lieu of payment for goods.

“A similar lack of success continued to mark the operations of the Balckfeet irrigation projects. The losses on some of the canals through seepage and high evaporation rates were admitted, but the Annual Report of the Project Manager for the Reservation claimed that the Indians were too inexperienced to succeed at farming irrigated lands. He complained that the Indians made little use of the irrigation capacities of the various projects.”

In March of 1916 a delegation from the new Tribal Council, which now included more full bloods and four illiterate members, went to Washington D.C. with many complaints. Two new concerns were “cleaning the rolls” of unentitled people and protecting the mineral rights. It appeared that Standard Oil believed it was worth drilling. At last now the Council took minutes and all signed them.

Ellis left in summer, 1917. Leasing and allotment were hopelessly entangled but US participation in WWI meant beef prices were up. This meant that the mixed bloods were becoming more and more wealthy while the gulf between them and the full-bloods widened. Thomas Ferris, the former stock supervisor, was briefly the superintendent, but soon left because of his health. McFatridge was eluding pursuit long enough to evade the statute of limitations for his theft, though he remained on the reservation.

Linnen and two other officials returned to the irrigation issue. “Each of the older canal projects needed expensive repair work, partly as a result of faulty construction. A dam had been constructed on the Two Medicine Creek system at a cost of $140,000 but many thousands of dollars more would be required before the system was fully operative. The Cut Bank Canal and Seville systems suffered from extensive seepage and, despite the costs already incurred, was capable of irrigating only 4,000 of the estimated 24,000 acres originally planned. The Badger Creek system, required in part because of the Interior Department’s generosity in dispensing with the Birch Creek water system (which had been diverted by the Conrad-Valier Company), carried water in 1917 for the first time since its construction in 1911-1912.

“ ‘From the foregoing it must be apparent that to date the large expenditure of about $1,000,000 has been made on this project without any beneficial result: that the Indians have had absolutely no benefits therefrom, and likely never will have unless it be from the increased value of their small forty acre allotments, which they will eventually sell, and it is doubtful if they will bring much more than the actual cost of irrigation.’”

Next came a quick sequence of agents: Wadsworth came in 1918, then Superintendent of Livestock F.C. Campbell, and by the year end Harvey O. Power, former Chief Clerk who had screwed up the leases and individual accounts. From 1919 until March of 1921 was Horace Wilson, dismissed for bigamy. Overgrazing, lack of bulls and drought-suppressed hay continued.

Campbell quite liked the idea of sheep. The leasing clerk was Stuart Hazlett, mixed-blood, whose muddling seemed always to benefit whites. But former Chief Clerk Harvey O. Power returned in 1918. Depending on whom one believed, everything was in great shape or everything was a shambles. Inspector Michael threw out Martin, Hazlett and Power.

In 1919 the superintendent was Horace Wilson, a drunk. Bribes, sub-leases, kickbacks, and side arrangements were the order of the day. The tribal herd, much to the relief of the tribe, was sold. It was a sinkhole for money which never got back to the Indians. Wilson’s cure for all this was to promote irrigation again. Besides persuading old full-bloods to sign a “petition” asking for irrigation, Snell, project manager from the Reclamation Bureau and Wilson sent letters to Senator Charles Curtis, Chair of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, telling him irrigation was “urgently needed.” Snell’s formal opinion was that the Indians were hopeless when it came to irrigation and that the whites who leased the “Indian’s irrigable lands...proved just as incompetent and unable to bring in an adequate harvest.” Still, Snell wanted more money for more construction.

“In fact, the only successful irrigation farming was being done by the Jesuits at the Holy Family Mission. The problem was that they had been taking water from the irrigation project for nearly twenty years -- free of cost. When Snell and Wilson recommended that the Jesuits pay at least fifty per cent of the rate charged to individual users along the same canal project, the Jesuits refused to sign the report, claiming that the school children benefited from the farm.”

In 1919 and 1920 many people who had been self-sufficient were forced back onto rations. The deaths from starvation have never been counted, but in spite of local outcries from white people, the government simply insisted everythng was fine.


PART THREE: Comrade Campbell’s Five Year Plans: 1921 -1929


F.C. Campbell had spent over 25 years in the Indian Service, had briefly been Superintendent, and was a sheep rancher himself. He reported that the situation was absolutely rock bottom. A big vigorous man, he went everywhere advocating his solution: farming. In the process he alienated mixed-bloods and some of the “Friends of the Indian.” He organized granges who could share heavy equipment and support each other while competing among themselves, thus re-creating the old bands of the Blackfeet. He discouraged cattle and was discouraged by the necessity of keeping records, which were a mess as usual.

In December of 1922, J.W. Schultz published a pamphlet entitled “The Blackfeet Are Starving.” It didn’t attack Campbell but was dubious of his plan and accused the Indian Bureau. The new Business Council elected Robert Hamilton as chair and Joseph Spanish as secretary. Richard Sanderville identified with Campbell. Oliver Racine, aligned with Hamilton, was an enemy of Campbell who tried to get rid of him on grounds of adultery. Burke, the Indian commissioner, thought that if they just let Hamilton alone he would hang himself.

Burke then put pressure on Campbell about the irrigated lands, which were not the same as the small family garden plots that Campbell was supporting and not on the same land. Burke said if the Indians wouldn’t farm that irrigated land, whites should be encouraged to lease the land and farm it. Campbell tried to explain that not all the irrigation canals even functioned. The next plague was the classical grasshoppers in 1924, not counting trachoma and tuberculosis.

Oliver Sanderville, who was not in agreement with Richard, now complained about Campbell. The small community organizations by-passed the Tribal Business Council, which upset them enough to “vote Campbell out.”

In 1928 Campbell sealed his fate by selling the burgeoning, if mangy, horse herds to the Chappel Brothers. This verged on heresy.

Walter Liggett, Senate investigator, began to take testimony in 1928. [The orginal publication didn’t take place until 1932, but recently was re-published in installments in The Glacier Reporter.] Campbell had to ask Forrest Stone, Assistant Superintendent and Disbursing Agent, to answer many questions because he didn’t know himself.

These are Liggett’s headings:

1. Indian Defrauded by Deliberate Conspiracy. (The finger was pointed at the Sherburne Mercantile Company.)
2. Tribal Possessions Dissipated. (Mostly the misuse of the original compensations for loss of reservation land.)
3. No Accounting of Tribal Herd. (They seemed to mysteriously mehttp://www2.blogger.com/img/gl.italic.giflt.)
4. Indians’ Interests Seem Secondary. (How the Great Northern Railroad secured advantages, including suppressing Blackfeet businesses, though Liggett himself objected to getting Indians to meet trains, dance, and tell stories. He said it was undignified.)
5. Agency Officials Dominate Council. (Joe Brown was accused in the horse sale.)
6. No Accounting Made to Indians and Leasing. (General bad practice and judgment.)

In 1929 Forrest Stone became the next agent.

PART FOUR: Oil, Oil!

Leases had been given since 1914 but no one drilled. There was some question whether the tribe owned the mineral rights under its own land. The US Geological Survey said there was no oil in the northeast sector, though that was where it was most avidly sought. Mysteriously, Louis Hill, son of the Great Northern Railroad magnate James J. Hill, had a ten year lease secured in some sort of by-pass through Washington, D.C. He did a lot of tricky stuff. By this time there were many small wild-cat operations around, some operating behind Indian cat’s paws. [This continues to the present.] Campbell disliked all this oil stuff and sat on leases. Hamilton was the main person pushing for drilling.

The first oil strikes were in 1930 on the eastern edge of the reservation. The US Government refused to do anything about test wells just over the line on Indian land. The officials seemed paralyzed.


CHAPTER VII Tribal Democracy 1930-1950

(This section is 43 pages long and has 136 footnotes. It is the final chapter.)

Forces on the reservation included Depression and then WWII. Government help during the Depression didn’t affect the reservation much. WWII meant that many, esp. mixed bloods, left for Pacific Coast war-worker jobs or for the military, where they were welcome, but returned home to a bad situation. One of the worst effects was even more of a split with the old full-bloods.

The Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, which gave the reservation self-government, opened the door to internal graft. The government seemed to withhold any help or guidance. The tribe turned againhttp://www2.blogger.com/img/gl.bold.gifst the government.

PART ONE: Unplannning, 1930-1935

Same old story: land lease mismanagement, bad bookkeeping, overgrazing. Senator King of Utah said: “It is peculiarly significant that the Indian Bureau’s opposition to the reorganization program... was first developed and made effective in connection with the Blackfeet irrigation project of Montana. As I have already pointed out, this Blackfeet project is one of the most dismal of the Indian Bureau’s irrigation failures. The Preston-Engle Committee had recommended the total abandonment of the Blackfeet project and had insisted that no new capital investment be sunk in ths project... However the Indian Bureau’s irrigation division was determined to go forward with new capital investment... Engineer Hanna... assured the House Appropriations Committee... ‘we can refund that whole amount in time.’ The ‘whole amount’ to which Mr. Hanna referred was one million dollars.”

In 1935 Superintendent Stone was replaced by Warren O’Hara. A herd of 5,500 “drought cattle” was brought in by the government about the same time. They were in terrible shape (as usual) and 300 were lost through the severe winter (as usual). In 1934 138 Indian families (blood quantum not mentioned) were self-supporting and 747 families were receiving federal assistance through a combination of relief and rations. Campbell’s farming was OUT.

If grazing leases were problematic, oil leases were exponentially worse. Now that major strikes were made alongside the reservation near Cut Bank, everyone claimed rights. The Tribe was frantic in its desire and genuine need for the development of oil. The US Geological Survey was now involved and the Cut Bank oil tycoons began to have state political clout. At a time when the federal government was determined to make the tribe pay its own way, the tribe needed help in managing the bonanza but didn’t get it.


PART TWO: The Council’s Peculations, 1935-1945


C. L. Graves, the new superintendent, thought of organizing as Campbell had, but this time with stock associations. Special Agent Williams addressed the subject of equipment inventories: condemned and missing machinery was valued at $100,000.

David Rodnick, government anthopologist, reported that the reservation had developed “two antagonistic cultures.” The agency staff was seen as aligned with the agency staff and the fullbloods felt their only defenders were the federal Indian Office people.

In September of 1939 Special Agent Marvin Clark found that the Council’s cashbook journal had not been updated since January 1 and many receipts were missing. There was also an assortment of cash and checks unaccounted for. (The Treasurer was Nancy M. Goss.) Individual Council members felt free to make loans with a formal vote of the whole. Chairman Hazlett’s bonding company wanted to cancel his bond. John Collier wanted to turn all the evidence over to the Justice Department, but Superintendent Graves promised that tribal funds would be kept in “...a special individual money account at the Blackfeet Agency where tribal funds can be under the scrutiny and control of the superintendent.”

The Tribal Council included Brian Connolly, Wright Hagerty, and Levi Burd, all cattle ranchers with reservation leases, on which they waived bidding and bonding. Nancy Goss was discovered to be writing checks to herself and not depositing the oil royalties that Graves was supposed to be monitoring. The unhappy full bloods took a council with representatives of the Indian Bureau that included D’Arcy McNickle. Now the government wanted to be paid for those “drought cattle” bought at bargain rates in the Depression at the higher wartime rates.

The issue of how to handle oil leases united full-bloods and mixed-bloods but divided the tribe from the government, which was considering just taking back control of oil, but they did nothing more than consider. In 1942 the council just went ahead and made their own arrangements without asking or telling any federal people. A fellow named Teter interposed himself as a sort of agent at large, promising better royalties. The same leases were issued to different people.

Things got bad enough that Senator Burton K. Wheeler was asked by a committee of Indians to remove authority from the Tribal Council and call in the F.B.I. -- he relayed this to Secretary Ickes. Felix Cohen was now involved as a government representative. Ewers, who had just built the Museum of the Plains Indian in Browning, was also involved. Many prominent locals, including Brian Connolly and George Pambrun, were caught up in cross-accusations of wrong-doing.


PART THREE: The Council vs. the Bureau Post-war.

The sheep economy crashed after the war. In 1947 a District Office was added, but didn’t seem to help. Rex Kildow was the new superintendent. The “Tribal Store” was created and then collapsed. Per capita payments kept the grumbling to a minimum. The oil revenue began to shrink, several tribal businesses failed, delinquent leases were not collected. An audit couldn’t be completed for lack of records. Kildow said the government was severely letting the tribe down by letting the council run it to suit their own personal needs. Again there were threats of prosecution, but nothing happened. A complication was presented by Felix Cohen’s employment by the Council. He encouraged them to have their own account in local banks. The assets of the tribe were rapidly being dispersed.

D’Arcy McNickle, Chief of the Tribal Relations Branch, urged that the Indian Bureau should fulfill its trust responsibility and preserve trust property. Investigators were no match for Felix Cohen.

In 1952 the Council (Chairman George Pambrun, advised by Cohen) asked to have the state to take over road management, education and extension. Not much changed.

THE TALE IS NOT THE REALITY: Senator Butcher

I was going to write about something else today, but two synchronistic messages have pointed me this way. One was Montana Senator Butcher’s letter of reply to Dorothea (Dottie) Susag, a teacher who advocated the funding of Indian education in Montana schools. A bill requiring the teaching of Native American history, literature and so on has already been passed but at that time no money was allocated for materials, research, and so on. (You know that strategy.)

The other was a comment on a post I wrote a long time ago in which I included a throwaway comment about Richard Lancaster, author of “Piegan,” a book that won prizes. I said that I personally disliked Lancaster so much that I was not an objective commenter on the book. (I should say that I knew the people in the book, including both “old” and “young” Jim, and I liked them.) The book is written around the idea that Lancaster was an adopted member of the Jim Whitecalf family and that the book was a journal of things that actually happened. The book also assumes he was welcome, which is in doubt.

The subject I’m addressing here is the image of Indians, the state of our understanding of them, and the mischief it can create. Butcher is the easier case and the pleasanter person, though he is constantly reviled for being a politically incorrect, intolerant, stereotyping red-neck -- in short -- a fossil with a constituency.

Because Butcher went to Eastern Montana University in Billings back in the Sixties (where he was a dorm-mate of Darrell Kipp, Blackfeet poet, educator, and opera librettist), was a history “professor” for ten years and has a graduate minor in anthropology, he thinks that he has a good grasp on the state of thought about Indians when, in fact, this is a field that has been almost totally revolutionized in the last few decades. Even Indians themselves can barely keep up with the new research, writing and ideas, which is why Montana needs this material to be in the curriculum.

Let me go back to picking on Darrell, Butcher’s friend. Darrell was the beneficiary of a Harvard master’s degree program specifically meant for Indians that goes back to the earliest roots of that University. (Maybe Butcher doesn’t realize that Benjamin Franklin’s assistant at his printing press was an Indian, which is why Franklin knew so many Indian concepts about organizing government that he was able to bring to bear on the US Constitution. Maybe he doesn’t know that the Cherokee had a printing press and a newspaper, using a printed form of their own language, until the US Government smashed and dispersed their towns.) I would like to know what Darrell would say if Butcher told him that the Indian vocabulary was impoverished until they learned to farm and joined the industrial age, since Darrell has devoted his life to bringing back the complex and nuanced language of the Blackfeet that contains words for concepts I doubt have crossed Butcher’s mind.

But I’ve known plenty of highly educated people who cling to ideas suggested in the 19th century because they simply don’t know more than that. They haven’t kept up. They think that Indians are about anthropology and archeology, people of the past. Usually that’s because they don’t know any Indians or they know Indians who constantly emphasize the glorious past. They still subscribe to the “Vanishing Indian” dogma that whites only hoped was so. Somehow, as Adolf Hungry Wolf has remarked, Indians have not just failed to vanish, they have undergone a renaissance.

Lancaster’s book plays into that old notion as well -- that Native Americans were mystical, noble, and better than any whites, but are now degraded and about to flicker out. People who love the book accept and even cherish that idea. They’re the ones who love James Welch’s “Fools Crow” (an early choice for “One Book Montana,” a program to get everyone in Montana to read the same worthy book at the same time) but won’t read “The Indian Lawyer,” which is about a modern professional. Sherman Alexie says pungent things about such readers. I wonder if Butcher has ever read any Sherman Alexie books. I bet he loved “Dances with Wolves” and congratulated himself that he already knew so much anthropology, that he was qualified to comment on the “accuracy” of the movie.

But I’ll bet he never sat down to read “The Foley Report.” (Oh, what a good idea! I’ll print out the notes and send them along to him.) Much of Montana Indian history does not reflect well on the white men who were charged with their education and protection -- and I’m not talking about Custer.

Including Indian history and writing in school curriculums is far from being a “little anthropology project” as Butcher terms it. More like a prelude to Vietnam and Iraq and I don’t mean the exciting combat stories. I’m talking about the family smashing, the wealth destruction, the insincere promises, the sheer voraciousness of the powerful. As Darrell said once in a Great Falls Conference on Agricultural Families, “If we don’t pay attention, one day everyone in Montana will find out they have become ‘Indians.’” I’m not suggesting that Butcher is a person who would do these things, but he’s playing right into their hands.

Lancaster was a Texan who came to Montana and personally smashed families, broke the law, insulted many people, and leeched off Montana Indians and artists who could ill-afford it -- then basked in the glory of it all. I will give you the details only “orally.” His female back-east editor guided and controlled the book to make sure it conformed to the stereotypes. Maybe you know about the hunting writer who told us at the Montana Festival of the Book that when he reported truthfully that his little group ate gourmet Cornish hens and wild rice for one of their evening meals, his editor forced him to change it to what SHE thought that hunters ate, like grouse they’d just killed and roasted on a stick, because otherwise “no one would believe it.” We never become enlightened, because people like their stereotypes better than they like the reality.

The Indians, being human, do that, too. They are pretty hard on poor old Butcher, who could catch up if he wanted to. So could OPI.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

CM RUSSELL ART AUCTION

There are two “swing points” or seasonal picket pins in my year. One is the Montana Festival of the Book in the fall and the other is the CM Russell Museum Benefit Auction the Great Falls Ad Club does on on Charlie’s birthday in March. Norma Ashby was the Force who created the first auction. This is the 39th and Norma put in an appearance despite losing her husband just recently. In the lives of Great Falls people, this is a major event. In the existence of the Museum itself, the money is crucial. But the auctions are not the same over the years. In fact, the genre of Western Art is morphing enough that the owners of “Art of the West” magazine felt they had to defend the boundaries in their March/April issue. Fine representational art, in the form of plein aire painting and “classical” art, is threatening to re-engulf “Western art.”

I often speak (cynically) of the Industrial Cowboy Art Cartel. What I mean is (taking one word at a time) that it is less a matter of individual inspiration and skill than it is a manufacturing process (industry); that is based on a romantic and dramatic notion of the West (cowboy); that portrays objects “in a representational manner” (art); and “a monopolistic control of the market” (cartel). Those who take the romantic “cowboys and Indians” point of view (especially the customers) want to feel that the artists are unique and that buying their works will take the customers into their privileged world -- that it is a “blameless” and even “patriotic” thing to do. The cartel members want customers to use art as they would use any other capitalistic means to store and trade money to increase value, like the stock market or real estate. They’re very much invested in strategies that control that or predict that process -- auctions and the websites that monitor them are their ticker-tape.

A common advertising concept is “branding.” First of all, one establishes a “brand” of commodity like Coca Cola, or Pepsi, or RC. So the person who paints in a representational way and lives in the West or chooses to paint Western subjects, is ahead if they are “Western” or “Cowboy” artists. They are very much aided by the Manhattan dominated “modern” art world which pretends that “real” art is unrecognizable, but excellent for pondering: articles, curating, cocktail party talk, status marking. They have overplayed this attitude enough that an equal and opposite defensive contempt has developed among ordinary people who love calendar art and loved magazine art before it disappeared: the people who don’t feel that it is a failure of intellect to read a Western, no matter what one’s educational level might be. So this “branding” is very much assisted by the need of the less-initiated to have a high-status art product that doesn’t require a course in how to talk about it. (I like the pun between this kind of “branding” and the kind of branding one imposes on cattle in order to prove ownership.)

The artist or gallery works within that “branding” to establish the individual artist as a sub-brand like “Zero Coca Cola,” or “Cherry Coke,” or “Diet Coke.” The artist develops a style, maybe a particular subject matter, a technique or a practice. Soon he or she finds himself “painting to the market,” that is, painting what will sell. Certainly Charlie Russell did this -- at least if Nancy had anything to do with it. Now the artist is manufacturing.

The cartel grows up around cowboy art because of the need for promotion and what some elegantly call “curating,” which means “what is it and how much is it worth.” One can see, literally, what the current market will bear by watching the auctions. (There are several peripheral auctions that happen parallel to the Russell Auction, which brings in the big-bucks customers and speculators because the Auction now has enough clout to market major artists’ works.) This is the first year there has been an explicit “Appraisal Show,” in which one brings one’s own objects (peripheral materials like posters, books, cowboy and Indian artifacts are often sold alongside art). I count ten “appraisers” (who are not called “curators” because they are not academic and not affiliated with non-profit institutions) and I’m VERY uncomfortable with some of the most avaricious of them being on the boards of Montana nonprofits.

At this Appraisal Show, if the object is worthy, one is invited to take one of three actions: keep your object but insure it or loan it to an important non-profit, sell it through the auction, or donate it for a suitable tax deduction. (Watch the law carefully on this last one -- the laws are squirming.) The effect of this is that the cartel gets a feel for what’s out there without having to travel. (Dick Flood got his start selling leather supplies all over the West. He and others went through about this time of year with a car trunk full of materials they’d found one way or another -- in those days, maybe stashed in chicken houses or hanging in smoky saloons.) It also lets them vacuum up more material for more auctions and more museums, galleries, historical societies and so on. AND it establishes them as authorities who can impress and guide customers. The customers, of course, always hope for big money or high status. These events open up marvelous opportunities for graft, deception, and self-aggrandizement. Buyer beware.

This is also the first year that the Russell Auction has frankly “de-accessioned” materials -- that is, sold art from its own collection. This is happening all over at the moment, with the justification that there is no room to display the works properly (In the huge mausoleum that is the CMR Museum, that’s laughable!) or that the “focus” of the collection is different. Thus, they auction the Couse paintings (very valuable) on grounds that they are concentrating on the “northern Plains,” which is not true. The most notorious example of this was some time ago when ancient Indian baskets were sold out of the Maryhill Museum in order to buy paintings by a friend of the curators. Or for the most recent scandal, Google “Eakins”+“The Gross Clinic.” Closer to home was Russell’s “Exalted Ruler,” being sold by the Elks, which at least gave the public enough notice to raise money and buy it for the museum.

Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the artists themselves are welcome to sell direct to customers in the individual “corrals” represented by motel rooms in the same motel where the auction has happened by the swimming pool for many years. It’s down to a system by now -- even the parking, which is complicated by the semi-trailers where the ordinary motel furniture is stashed plus the U-Haul trailers and stock trailers that bring the art, some of which is extraordinarily large. Galleries and independent traders also abound here. Networking goes on as fast as any frenzied spider could make a web.

Two seminars are always presented at this event. In the past they’ve been carelessly prepared by the artists who speak and the technology of presenting images via computer projection has crashed. This did not happen at the Ginger Renner/B. Byron Price presentation, maybe (cynically) because these folks are from the cartel side of the equation. Ginger Renner makes money from being able to identify Russell works, separate out the fakes, and estimate values. She earned this knowledge through marriage to and experience alongside Fred Renner who devoted himself to Charlie from the time he was a little boy living in the same Great Falls ‘hood. (Fred has passed on.) Also, Ginger is a person of great charm who can tell a story as smoothly in her husky Southern accent as any movie star.

B. Byron Price, who runs the CM Russell Center for the Study of Western Art at the University of Oklahoma, represents the academic side of the cartel (previously in nonprofit management). The Center, which is funded by the Trust left by Nancy Russell, has been absorbed into the project of creating a C.M. Russell Catalogue Raisonee, which is a huge database of his more than 5,000 works complete with images, provenance (where each piece has been and is now), size, etc. This will dismay those who have profited from works that “might be” Russells, but will be good for trade in people represented as a Russell alternative. Anyway, it’s clear that B. Byron has found his niche. He’s a natural nit-picker and bean-counter who is very much into being industrious in a way that can be called scholarship. He also enjoys being anointed by the cartel.

Though I was fascinated by this seminar, my real purpose in going was to webwork with friends old and new and that I did. This brings me to the real crux of what I thought about driving back under a gray, complicated sky. (There were many different levels of kinds of cloud and a strong wind creating both arches of cloud and stacks of lenticular -- saucer-shaped -- clouds.)

This is about the Indian side of Western side, because the cowboy side has long been “owned” by the Reagenesque people who put Remington bronzes in the Oval Office, gone crazy-glitzy in the slick life-style magazines who pander to the rich and make bull-riding into a major show biz extravaganza. The Indian-art side has split out in several very interesting ways, but the split I want to address is between white artists who are from “here” and white artists who are from “outside.” I see a pecking-order scuffle. It’s rather like Ian Frazer fist-fighting with Alexie Sherman. (Egad!) Or -- wait! I said both white -- maybe Ian Frazer fist-fighting with Frank Waters.

Those who come from outside want their painting expertise and experience in the larger world to be recognized. They feel they are the heirs of the Cowboy Artist of America heroes who turned to easel art when the illustrators’ market crashed. And they are slick -- they can handle people who are rich or intending to get richer. They understand branding and cartels. They run onto a problem when they come to Indians because they are romantic and don’t really know very many Indians, esp. not the 19th century kind. And Indians operate in entirely different ways. Anyway, they don’t want to paint contemporary Indians or even reservation Indians.

There are others who have lived around here early in their lives and returned because they love it. These people KNOW Indians, have known them all their lives. They did know the 19th century old-timers who are gone now and their romanticism runs in a rather different direction, based on their direct experience and not secondary sources like books or movies. They figure that should trump newcomers. I used to say that we belonged to the “Before Fred Fellows Society” (BFFS), which wasn’t really fair since Fred identified as a cowboy. Anyway, some of the BFFS’s have had a rough go of it and are not treated with much kindness by the cartel.

There are a few Indian artists exhibiting now. And I got kissed by former student Richard Ground (and hugged by his wife Elsie). Their daughter, Amorette AKA Pretty Owl Woman, posed for David Powell, my near-relative since I’ve known him so long, and a photo of that showed up on the front page of the GF Tribune this morning -- that is, the Quick Draw, not the kiss. (A video of the Quick Draw and a photo gallery of the whole auction are available on www.greatfallstribune.com.)

I also enjoyed meeting Tom Gilleon, whose trademark mystic tipi paintings are so loved, and his wife, Laurie Stevens, whom I’ve known since she was part of “Latigo & Lace,” the excellent shop in Augusta. Now she’s emphasizing her own art. It was these two who gave me the free tickets to the Montana Nutcracker ballet. And I ran across Rex Rieke several times, busily trying to figure out whether certain “ancient” pipes really were that. Don’t ask me! No idea. I was sorry to miss Rex’ wife, who reads this blog.

I knew nothing about most of the artists, quite a bit about the art, and an uncomfortable amount about the cartel members. The art buyers and patrons were aging quickly. For many of them, this will be the last roundup. But the auction doesn’t seem to be winding down.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

THE FOLEY REPORT: Introduction

THE UNITED STATES AND THE BLACKFEET TRIBE
1655 - 1950’s

INTRODUCTION

This report provides an historical analysis of the trust administration of the United States of the lands and assets of the Blackfeet Tribe of Montana. Chapter I includes an analysis of the early period from 1855 through 1888 when the Gros Ventre were considered a part of the Blackfeet Confederation (The Blackfeet, Piegans and Bloods), and pursuant to the Treaty of October 1, 1855, the Blackfeet and Gros Ventre were the co-owners of a large part of what is today northern Montana.

This report is not an ethnological nor an historical account of the Blackfeet Tribe; except insofar as the Indians were touched by the actions of the United States as their trustees and overseer of their Reservation. A detailed historical analysis is provided of the Government’s administration of tribal funds, lands and resources within a chronological framework. The scope of the study has been shaped by both the availability of the historical documents and limited to those historical trends pertinent to the legal claims of the Tribe as explained by the tribal claims attorneys. Thus, for example, there is no discussion of the problem of alcoholism on the Reservation in the twentieth century, eve though no history of a reservation would be complete without such a discussion.

On the other hand, there is detailed treatment of the whiskey trade rampant on the Reservation in the last quarter of the nineteenth century, since this trade was an integral part of the corrupt system existing that the Reservation in which Montana politicians and entepreneurs exploited the Reservation’s Indians and their resources with the acquiescence and in many instances the active assistance of government agents.

The historical evidence on which the report is based was gleaned from literally thousands of documents reviewed by the historian or research assistances, Messrs. Steven Sawyer and Edward Case and esp. Mr. Robert McGillicuddy, working directly under the historian’s supervision for a period of two years. The primary research effort was conducted at the National Archives in Washington, D.C. However, extensive additional research was undertaken at the Museum of the Plains Indian, Browning, Montana; the Seattle Federal Records Center in Washington; the Montana Historical Society, Helena, Montana; the Department of the Interior Library in Washington, D.C.; the Federal Records Center in Suitland, Maryland; and the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. In addition, documents were obtained from the official records of the Blackfeet Tribe, Montana; the Billings Area Office of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Montana; the Lauinger Library and Gunlocks Collection of Rare Books of Georgetown University, Washington, D.C. Finally, research was also conducted at the Minnesota Historical Society at Minneapolis, Minnesota; the Montana State Unvirsity Library at Bozeman, Montana; and the University of Texas Library, Austin, Texas; and the Denver Federal Records Center.

Other historical research was done by Merrill Burlingame, Professor of History, Montana State University, at the time he served as expert witness in previous cases before the Commission. This material and the documents obtained by other expert witnesses in previous cases before the Indian Claims Commission and in the present case were made available to the historian by the Tribal Claims Attorneys, Wilkinson, Cragun & Barker.

Much of the historical evidence cited relates to mineral resources and the grazing ranges and the timber lands of the Tribe, as well as the government’s administration and accounting procedures. The author claims no expertise as an accountant, land appraiser, range economist or mineralogist. However, some technical matters in this area are necessarily treated in their historical context in order to provide a complete picture of the government’s administration of the Reservation. The original Blackfeet-Gros Ventre Reservation encompassed a vast acreage and contained considerable and varied natural wealth.

Beginning with the Executive Orders of 1873 and 1874, the Blackfeet Reservation had its southern borders pushed northward from the Sun River past the Teton to its present location along Birch Creek and the Marias River. In 1888, the reservation was reduced again and the eastern boundary became the Marias River north along Cut Bank Creek for some twenty miles and then due north in a straight line to the northern boundary, the international boundary between Canada and the United States. By the Agreement of 1898, the Blackfeet ceded the present day area of Glacier National Park. With the series of reductions the location of the Blackfeet Agency moved progressively northward, too, retreating before Montana’s miners from Fort Benton to a point near the town of Choteau, then again with the cattlemen’s advance to Badger Creek, and again to Willow Creek and finally to a point near present day Browning, Montana.

Once considered amongst the most tenacious tribes of the Northwest -- the “Raiders of the Northern Plains” as John Ewers described them -- the Blackfeet Confederation was decimated by smallpox, starvation and the massacre of Heavy Runner’s band on the Marias River in 1870. After the exodus north by the Blackfeet and Blood Indians, the Piegans remained the dominant element in the Blackfeet Tribe living under the control of the United States. They endured through the starvation winter of 1883-1884, witnessed the extermination of the buffalo and the rise of northern Montana’s livestock industry as cattle and sheep fattened on their range lands. The funds derived in consideration of their land cessions were dissipated by the mismanagement or peculations of their various agents. In a story on The Blackfeet Trouble, the Great Falls Tribune observed in 1802:

“Probably ever since the foundation of the United States... Indian Agencies have been productive of more trouble than any other branch of the government. It is likely this is partially so because the agent is a sort of king on his reservation; he is far from the central authority, and his opportunities for ‘making a little on the side’ are greater than those of most government agencies.

“ The Blackfeet Agency in Montana has been no exception to the rule. In fact, it seems to have produced more trouble of this sort than any other in the state.”


The “trouble” the journalist complained of has been recorded in the historical documents of the Office of Indian Affairs, in the private correspondence of Montana’s early settlers and entrepreneurs, in the newspaper accounts describing the exploitation of the reservation’s resources by individuals and corporations alike. From Fort Benton’s “merchant princes” on through the cattle barons like Dan Floweree, to the railroad magnate James J. Hill and the Montana Power Company, the white man has more often benefitted from the great wealth of the Blackfeet grazing lands and minerals than did the Blackfeet. The hopes of the Tribe’s few outside supporters such as George Bird Grinnell, remained unfulfilled. Even the hope regenerated by the reforms of John Collier and the Indian Reorganization Act seemed illusionary in a short time as a handful of mixed bloods, who dominated the Tribal Council, demonstrated their adoption of “white monetary attitudes” to the detriment of their much less sophisticated constituents.

By the 1950”s the Blackfeet Tribe had suffered through a century often well-intended but overwhelmingly bungled efforts by the Office of Indian Affairs. The historical documents amply testify to the failure of the Government’s shiftiing policies and the frequently corrupt men charged with their administration. The Blackfeet, both the ancestors who hunted on the plains and their survivors today, have given equally ample evidence of their courage. They have endured, and by their endurance alone they have triumphed over the failure of those entrusted with their improvement. The courage of the Blackfeet merited more than mere survival.

Michael F. Foley

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

FOLEY REPORT: TABLE OF CONTENTS

This study of the administration of the Blackfeet Reservation by the United States was prepared for a lawsuit against the government with the Indian Claims Commission, Docket Number 279-D. It is shocking, detailed, and explores the years between 1855 (the first treaty) and the 1950’s -- the years that few know much about. This fat document is frankly sympathetic to the Blackfeet and so full of facts that no one takes into account that many have tried to get copies. In the coming months I’ll try to put as much of it as I can online.

The Table of Contents itself is helpful because it lays out a time-line. The first four parts are introduction:

i. The various Blackfeet Reservations in Montana.
(Foley means historically, not geographically. The original rez was the top half of Montana -- since then it has been reduced step-by-step until now it is fifty miles on a side, sort of square.)
ii. Blackfeet Indian Reservation, Montana
iii. Leading Personalities
(I’ve converted this into a card file which I will use to develop an index of this document as well as references in other places. Foley included photographs of many of these people, all posed portraits of hairy whitemen except for one portrait of Joseph Kipp who was remarkably able to “walk on both sides.”)
iv. Introduction


I. INAUSPICIOUS BEGINNINGS: The Treaty of 1855 and its aftermath, 1855-1870.

II. DISINTEGRATION AND SURVIVAL: The Blackfeet Indians and Frontier Montana, 1870-1886
Part One: Whiskey Traders and Methodists, 1870-1876
Part Two: Tributary to the Bentonites, 1876-1884
Part Three: The Open Range, The Blackfeet Reservation, 1884-1886

III. IN THE CLUTCHES OF THE “AGENCY RING”: The Many “Friends” of the Blackfeet, 1887-1893
Part One: “He Ought to Be Removed:” Agent Mark Baldwin, 1886-1889
Part Two: Drunken Clerks and Jewelry Salesmen: Agent John B. Catlin 1889-1890.
Part Three: The Morphine Eater -- Strange Hero of the Intellectuals, Agent George Steell, 1890-1893.
Part Four: A Man on Horseback: Captain Cooke’s Entry, 1893.

IV. POLITICS, PATRONAGE AND PLUNDER: The Rise and Decline of the Blackfeet Cattle Industry: 1894-1899
Part One: Swords into Miners’ Picks: Captains of the Agency Ring, Lorenzo Cook, U.S. Army, Acting Agent, 1893-1895.
Part Two: The Last Refuge: Ceding the Mineral Strip, 1894-1895.
Part Three: Homecoming: The Return of George Steell, Cattle Baron, 1895-1897
Part Four: Refuge for the Republicans: Senator Carter’s Friends and the Blackfeet, 1897 - 1899

VI. “...A WHITE MAN’S PASTURE:” The Blackfeet Get Fenced, 1900-1910
Part One: Won’t You Come Home, Dan Floweree?” The “New Policy” and the Old Problems, 1900- 1905
Part Two: Standing Still, Going Backwards, 1905-1910.

V. BUREAUCRATIC BURDEN: The Office of Indian Affairs vs. The Blackfeet Tribe, 1910-1913.
Part One: The Family that Preys Together... “The Father, Son and Holy Terror: Superintendent McFatridge” 1910-1915
Part Two: Encore: The Return of Corruption and Starvation, 1915 - 1920.
Part Three: Comrade Campbell’s Five Year Plan, 1921 - 1929
Part Four: Oil, Oil Everywhere, but Not a Drill in Sight.

VII. THE MIXED BLESSINGS OF TRIBAL DEMOCRACY, 1930 - 1905’s.
Part One: Five years of Unplanning: 1930 - 1935
Part Two: Tribal Tribulations, The Council’s Peculations, 1935 - 1945.
Part Three: After the War Was Over: The Council vs. The Bureau.

Sunday, March 04, 2007

PAUL THOMAS STRACHAN 1944 - 2007



Paul was the third child and the last child. My father had made a great fuss about only having two children and the proper use of condoms, but when Paul came along three years or so after Mark (In those days one was supposed to leave a two-year gap between children), it was my mother who went back into the hospital for “repair work.” It was a tubal ligation.

Once Paul’s arrival was perceived, he was welcomed. My mother used to say that the last child was like a caboose -- having a little more play on both sides -- but he was a bright, eager, lovable child with bright red curls. When he got to the “don’t touch me” stage, he habitually wore a big black watchcap pulled down low to keep the little old ladies out of his hair.



My mother was basically a farm girl and Paul was up for all her adventures, especially the ones that ended in the kitchen.



She thought that Paul ought to have a dog when Mark and I went off to school. One day someone remarked, “I wonder what dogfood tastes like.” Paul piped up, “Like meatloaf.” A spoonful for the dog, a spoonful for himself -- it seemed perfectly natural to him.



But still, sometimes it just got kinda lonesome. Especially if you couldn’t find the ball. Duncan McTavish wasn’t much of a retriever and the ball was soon slimy with dog spit, but it was something to do.



I’ve often thought about this photo. The boys were “shooting” dandelions with 2-4D spray guns and they got quite a bit on themselves. They are quite different from me in some ways and I’ve wondered whether they were seriously contaminated by what was thought to be “entirely harmless.”



Still, it seemed as though we were all three big healthy kids who did well in school. Mark and Paul went through the steps of scouts but dropped out before getting into the higher reaches. Somewhere in there we switched over to 4-H and my mother took on a camp-cooking class for boys that was a big success. She got a permit to build a bonfire in Alberta Park and they all made little reflector ovens out of old shiny 5 gallon tins -- you cut out one side and make it into a shelf on the interior. Then they all made baking powder biscuits and were proud of themselves.



Of course we were all bookworms and, as a consequence -- or maybe it was a cause -- we all had huge intricate interior lives. I doubt that there was much, if any, overlap between us -- even between Mark and Paul. Yet we were all three about the “same smart,” meaning we did well on IQ tests, and definitely looked as though we were related, with hazel eyes and varying degrees of curly, red hair. Mark's hair was least red and curly but Paul was the only one not near-sighted.



In order to escape me -- the boys told anyone who would listen -- Mark and Paul went to Benson Polytechnical High School which in those days was "boys only." Both seemed to do quite well there. Paul was more into the machines and Mark focussed on radio and debate.

In later years, Paul always liked these technical, craftsman sorts of things, like both his grandfathers. He always kept a lot of tools and could repair things like toasters or mixers. He understood electrical motors and liked carpentry. Even when he was living in humble, even dubious, circumstances, he got all his tools lined up and decorated the place with pictures and sculptures. He liked to garden and in one place helped to make a couple of scarecrows that looked like an old man and an old woman on their hands and knees as though they were pulling weeds. Late in the evening they moved them around, which sometimes tripped up garden raiders who had observed where they were during daylight.



Both boys went into the Marines right out of high school so they could use the GI Bill to pay for college. Neither saw combat but Paul was an MP and was nearly sent into the Watts riots. He was stationed in Yuma to teach marksmanship and spent his days off riding a motorcycle around the desert trying to catch rattlesnakes. When he came back, he walked into the anti-Vietnam sentiment, which left him severely conflicted. On the one hand, he loved being a big guy in uniform who could throw his weight around -- though he was never one for fights and didn’t drink -- and on the other hand, he identified himself as a Eugene artist, which meant being a bit of a hippie.

He would have liked to be a painter, I think, but I never saw a finished painting. Instead he earned an MFA in metal-smithing and did a lot of silver work. His master’s thesis was a collection of fantasy armor fitted around small skeletons of birds and animals he’d found in the woods. One of the most memorable was a little helmet built over a child’s toy. It had a friction motor in it and when it was primed and put on the floor, it ran along occasionally flipping up a visor and peering out with two orange owly eyes.

He taught at Linn-Benton Community College where he built a foundry. One day he had a sack of cement on his shoulder, meaning to load it into his pickup, and stepped onto a bit of ice. He fell, the cement sack lit on top of his head and he suffered a concussion on his forehead. It amounted to a "trauma lobotomy."

When he could drive, he went back up to my mother’s house in Portland and said he could not work. He would have to live with her. He would not go to the doctor. All his friends agreed that doctors would only torment him and couldn’t do anything to help. This was in the early Eighties and was probably accurate, but it meant that there was no record of his injury and therefore no hope of qualifying for disability. After a while he went back to doing a bit of metalsmithing, giving it away, but mostly he lived like a retired person.


This was at my mother's house on September 15, 1990.

When my mother died, he took his third of the estate and lived on that back in Eugene. He became more and more paranoid and inclined to fantasies about being an undercover officer with a special commission. When he ran out of money, these fantasies got in the way of getting financial help. He was afraid of authority figures, tried to bluff them, and ended up being nearly arrested for impersonating an officer. He seemed so normal and was so clever that the caseworkers were always baffled and exasperated. Neither Mark nor I was in a situation where we could even send him money or take him in. We've all always been "arty" and broke.

For a while he lived with Tom Hatfield and his parents. Tom’s mother was my mother’s sister and sinking into dementia. When both parents died, the cousin who manages the ranch threw Paul out. Paul went back to Eugene, living in his truck, until he had a very serious heart attack before Christmas. He refused to stay in the hospital, was secretive about where he was at all, but was helped by a friend who took him in until he died from the effects of the heart damage, which meant it would no longer stay in rhythm. He would have been 63 in April. He is the second cousin of his generation to die. (The first was Carol Lee, who died of cancer.) My father died at the same age, but of a massive stroke about the same time of year.

Paul’s life and death raise all sorts of questions. Should my mother have forced him to get some kind of job? Should she have forced him to go to the doctor? I don’t think she could have. I gave both a try with no results except rage storms. Was there something genetic? Was it the time in the Marines that triggered something? Was he fooling around with drugs in the Eugene years?

Clearly his constant smoking was a major contributor to his death and his nutrition wasn’t that good once my mother was gone. Probably he would have died at about the same age even if he hadn’t been living in his truck, though that must have taken his stress level up.

Why didn’t he ever marry? He had a child out of wedlock, a little girl, but after the early years the mother clearly wanted to marry and he didn’t -- so she married someone else and no doubt the girl thinks that’s her father. If he’d married a good woman, would that have made his life longer or better? Maybe.

It’s ended now.

Thursday, March 01, 2007

NOVELS ABOUT ARTISTS

Since I have the beginning of a novel about an artist (female) floating around, I’ve been interested in other people’s novels about artists. Two showed up on the Daedalus remainder list, so I ordered them. (As usual, the books cost less than the shipping.) I had not read anything by either author before and, so far as I know, these were the only novels they had written about artists, although Iain Pears has written a book of art history.

The first book I read was “Port Mungo,” by Patrick McGrath, billed as a sort of “Night of the Iguana,” and indeed it was. But the sensibility, the “conceits,” if you like, are Manhattan. “Gin” tells the story about her brother Jack, whom she considers an unreliable genius saddled with an alcoholic and entirely off-the-rails wife. Gin holds the purse strings to the family fortune and doles out to Jack just enough to keep him alive in a sordid, collapsing old warehouse built out over the water in Port Mungo. He manages to be with his wife Vera just enough to have a daughter, a wild child who meets a mysterious drowning death just as she matures, and then a second daughter, who is taken by the highly respectable brother of Gin and Jack to be raised in England.

The narrator is unreliable and her assumptions are challenged as the story progresses and she finds out more and more until the shocking murder mystery ending. The point of the story is not the painting, but the lifestyles of painters and their impact on the lives around them -- the huge preoccupation with genius. Jack finally is no longer able to survive in Port Mungo and comes to live on the top floor of Gin’s house, which is a studio. By this time he is a sort of madman in the attic. His paintings, which he called “tropicalism” and tried to relate to Gauguin, are beginning to lose their appeal and even Gin is now a bit dubious about their “brilliance.” Then Vera and the younger daughter arrive, and the truth begins to out.

The whole thing is melodramatic, cliche ridden and great fun. Much eating and drinking. Very little serious attention is paid to actual painting -- just enough to keep the atmosphere arty and mysterious. It all goes along as smoothly and schematically as a tricycle on a sidewalk.

“The Portrait” by Iain Pears is also first-person, a long soliloquy by the artist himself as he addresses the subject of the portrait he is painting. This artist is also in a retreat, this time an island off the coast of France that is hard to get to and populated by fishermen who know only their work. The subject is an old friend and critic from a time when both were part of a group of embryonic artists in Paris. One soon realizes that this is like the famous soliloquy poems of Robert Browning (like “My Last Duchess”) and to say that the narrator is unreliable is to greatly understate the force and malevolence of what develops.

The sensibility is more English this time and the story slips in more references to actual painters -- Gaugain again! But the emphasis is on the psychological interplay among the artists themselves, all told in a very high-toned philosophical way. In the end the shocking scene is the provocation -- long-simmering -- for another murder, but it will be enacted after the book ends and in all probability it will never be detected as a crime. The emphasis is not so much on the painting as the surging emotions of the painter.

So what did I learn? That even people who don’t know much about art feel qualified to write about it. That in most people’s minds it addresses either the “insane genius” aspect or the hardships of the struggle towards fame and fortune. Not much about the skills or the techniques, at least in these two books. “Girl in a Pearl Earring” spent much more time on theory and things like the preparation of pigments. “The Underpainter” was so subtle that I lost interest and it sits on the shelf partly read. I guess I’ll have to double back. Googling "Novels about artists" brought up a long list.

Painting -- art -- appears to be a hook on which one can hang many kinds of hat. These two books were diverting but, in the end, not significant.

PS: I tried to upload photos of the covers with no success.