Friday, July 31, 2020
MUCH CONFUSION
Thursday, July 30, 2020
POSTED TO BLOGGER AS FEEDBACK
How I’ve been using blogger until now. This is feedback.
I have built a writing habit by writing 1,000 words every day, including weekends. This habit is strong enough to trigger complex ideas in a manageable way.
The index I’ve developed is the date. I manage what I write to be one-a-day. BUT I am always working along a few strands addressing issues, moving from one to another: Blackfeet; the last fifty years in this East Slope of the Rockies place; the cutting edge research on brain function; “religious” issues excluding institutions while concentrating on liturgy and ritual in all cultures; the economic and social basis controlled by the ecosystem. Memoir creeps in. I am NOT tagging according to the standards of techies.
I use the formal idea of a “blog” being a log of posts accessed through search engines. I use links all the time.
In a sense I’m following the pattern of sermons as an examination of moral systems, the nature of existence, and community life. But I don’t claim the idea of being clergy. Instead, I see the possibility of being a “public intellectual” — that is to say someone with a “high” education who yet belongs to the local and has both the leisure and the income to be free from any obligation to an institution whether public or private. I see this as helping to maintain the connections among all readers that guard our culture.
I have a special concern for the middle of the continent, but not the “midwest” with its specific culture of mostly white people, though both streams of my ancestors came to Oregon through the Midwest. The maternal side had been in the US for generations. The paternal side came from Scotland and my grandfather was educated there. Scotland seems to be an active source of “religious” ideas that are strongly humanist.
I’m an elitist but my definition of “elite” tends to be classic academic, as affected by the radical reform of contemporary Deconstruction, and moral character, not necessarily conventional. I think many people see blogging as just a personal or family thing, transient and for fun. I’m much more serious. Maybe there ought to be a label to warn readers like the one warning of X content. When I write about sex it’s more likely to be about meiosis in cells than about how to turn your partner “on”.
I think techies who develop interfaces and blog design are not aware of nor interested in these issues. They are obsessed with eye appeal and merchandizing. But maybe they should explain themselves in case I don’t get their thinking. They are as anonymous and scary as ninjas.
BY REQUEST
Dear friends,
This is a sort of letter to those who would like to be on an email group mailing list. You already know that I want out of Blogger because I can’t read their pale thin font and because I’ve lost trust. I had thought they were more permanent, which turns out to be a universal human misapprehension. NOTHING is forever.
I started looking at Medium by watching YouTube interviews with Ev Williams, who founded Blogger, Twitter and Medium. I like the way he thought. It was a good place to start.
Most of the things that frustrate me are true of all the social media. They demonstrated a structural social prejudice, pretty much like that on many levels across the USA. Everything is predicated on readers who are coastal, urban, educated, young, prosperous and up for tech. In fact, they seem to be more educated on tech stuff than on content. Yet Ev Williams had wanted good content.
He says, and I agree, that Facebook is much better able to serve people whose values are family rather than education or sophistication. This entirely neglects the evil aspect of Facebook, which I will ignore here. I think it is true, but also if some platform for video operated in the way Twitter does — short bits and images — meant for family even not English speakers and non-print people could be very successful. A sort of YouTube for individuals. You Tube is great for dummies like me, because I learn so much about fixit technique and so on. I see that much of it — esp. cooking — is already ethnic.
This idea of going oral also solves some of my problem with fonts, which is mostly that they are too thin and pale for my old eyes. In fact, I’ve read essays about how this is a mistaken aesthetic — that increased imperceptibility is somehow higher class. It reminds me of my mother’s conviction that anything narrow is more aristocratic, notably her shoe size and the width of her ear eustacian tubes.
Parallel to creating websites that accommodate different demographies, awareness of which is always increasing as the pressure of the people who need them mounts, is the problem of the intermediary instruments that “play” them. Already I am prevented from signing up for the Medium Partner program that shares payment with writers because I don’t have a cell phone. All pay transactions have to go through cell phones.
My carefully saved 8 tracks can only be seen as long as I keep the 8-track player. Already my CD’s are out of date. I’m being pushed to the Cloud, which is totally misnamed and vulnerable, being a massive warehoused datebase near a river for cooling.
I wonder how practical it might be to permit parallel simpler platforms on Medium or Blogger. I don’t need graphs and computations. Just clean print. But techies love to elaborate. Content to them is like those babbles for making examples of forms. Could there be platforms like WriteNow once was, simple and ideal for people who work with print, literary, no emoticons.
As everywhere in this culture, the quality of content is dictated solely by what sells. This means that what is purported to be the decisions and subjects of the writer is really the taste of the overlord, whether called publisher or curator. And that, in turn, is really the taste of the culture — as though it were one taste, one definition of quality.
Ev Williams talks about feedback loops. What he’s really talking about is forces for conformity from the larger culture who express what they want through looking and clicking.
Feedback loops do not respond to morality or progression into the future.
This is what I know so far.
Monday, July 27, 2020
BUSHWHACKED
A GOOD TEACHER
In some circles I’m remembered as a “good teacher.” This comes from how I started out in 1961. There was a dissenter in 1989 because to her a good English teacher was someone who corrected everyone all the time. They knew the right way and were mission-like in their zeal to teach everyone. That echoed more recently off-rez in a white town where an English teacher was supposed to supply endless worksheets about usage. I was so despised and lost there that I only lasted a few months.
The truth is that where I was “good” as a teacher was at listening. I permitted anything, even “bad” language, and listened carefully. If a question was honest, I answered it. “What is Massengill powder?” (Stuff to use for a female vaginal douche. Not recommended by doctors.) “What is an orgasm like?” I told her it was like a sneeze. Now a grandmother, she tells me it was years before she figured out what I meant, that it was an involuntary release and relief. “Why do white people wear black at funerals? If they really believe the person is going to heaven, they ought to be celebrating.” Lots of “why do white people . . .” questions.
My method came from theatre. I tried to “be” these kids though white teachers were blocked from their homes and the parts of their kid-lives they kept secret. This is quite different from having a pattern in mind that one is trying to impose, call out, evoke, by whatever means necessary. Teacher life is on paper and blackboards. Student life is whispered words. No relationship.
At Heart Butte I was required tp wrote a curriculum plan. I’ve always been opposed to lockstep “grades” with prescribed levels and content. In this case it was impossible because kids had failed grade 9, but then was enrolled in grade 10 until some were taking three levels of “English” without mastery of any because the earliest were presumed to be precursor access to the next one in line.
I fought this by assigning themes to each year: grizzlies, lovers, etc. and accenting the literature aspect instead of the constant hammering of conventional usage. Not grammar, which is a way of achieving clarity, but the proper use of words that demonstrate conformity.
In class I tried to enliven question and answer by using a thrown ball instead of a “talking stick” as in some circles: the person holding the ball/stick can talk. Handing off or throwing gives the floor to the next person. This stopped working because much of classroom action was “gamed,” that is, the interactions had only one purpose which was a kind of war between teacher and pupils, a competition to baffle and stymie. Even good-natured versions not interrupted by excesses that meant punishment, were not helpful.
My other innovation was to write the curriculum in terms of four strands: reading and writing plus listening and speaking. The principal could not understand this. In the first place he thought oral interaction was not worthy of teaching, had no content. In the second place, he was trying to impose order by asking for what we had written as grade steps. He could not understand individual levels of sequenced learning with everyone at their own level.
The bottom line was that textbooks and workbooks controlled everything because there was no way to do preparations that were unique, either teacher-generated or taught in an original way. There was no time and it was before the Internet. The name of education is CONFORMITY. Truthfully, most people didn’t think there was any other way to do it. I hardly knew myself and I hadn’t been back to teaching long enough to have an archive of my own.
Now that I do, I discover that no one wants it. I’ll be interested to see whether the pandemic can jar people loose. But I’m only distantly curious about what happens. It’s their business, not mine.
When people create an identity, the beginning is the charmed circle in the infant is based on care — feeding, caressing, cleaning. Then the boundary of that circle is expanded to the family and the immediate community. In an ideal world, the circle would include education — even a school. But on the reservation there is so much difference and there has been so much damage that the natural boundary has become a wall with an abyss on the outside, so there can be white crocodiles in it. The kids won’t attack their teachers, but they will evade them, stonewall them, punk them.
But there must be ways in. Forming student coalitions among kids who want to learn is one. Persuading parents to understand might be helpful. Cooperations of understanding among teachers, who by now include many who are tribal but not too assimilated to be an interpreter. Administrators, also now often tribal, can make spaces.
An industry has grown up that markets teaching materials and discipline gimmicks to teachers and administrators. Often they are ambitious tribal people but more likely they are white people who represent themselves as sort of a cross between anthropologists and missionaries. They take several days to present lectures and experiences that are meant to be nearly magical in finding the key to happy schools on reservations.
One was about controlling classes by delaying their dismissal, counting seconds according to the seriousness of failure to obey. The theory was that for the kids the most precious time was “passing” when they could talk, visit their lockers, and get to the rest room. Therefore, denying them those seconds would pinch them.
Another was an anti-drug workshop to teach awareness, solidarity, and willingness to change. It promoted itself as tribal in origin and the leaders were indeed Apache. Tribal rivalry, disgust with the illustrations on the materials showing kids dizzy or goofy, and unfamiliar New Age gimmicks (everyone stands in a circle back-to-front and sits at the same time so everyone is sitting on everyone) were scary.
These marketers of fancy ideas were expensive, left after a couple of days, and then broke contact. Their programs didn’t work. But they look good to school boards.
I became a former teacher.
Sunday, July 26, 2020
DAYS OF HEAVEN ON THE PRAIRIE
Well, heck. I think I’ve finally grasped the electrical and dazzling true nature of the world and existence and I open the door to all this wonder . . . and everyone is already there, calling to me and inviting me to watch a vid about Terrence Malik. Here is a link to it:
It is a poetry of image. I didn't forget Malick.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5f6rpDlfX5A
I think religion right now is in its Malick stage.
Saturday, July 25, 2020
"FEAR CITY" -- WATCH IT.
Friday, July 24, 2020
IS A BLOG A MAGAZINE?
---------------------------------
This didn't work. It was supposed to be in a box. I suppose I'm going to have to read the instructions. Sigh.
__________________________________________
I get confused by the lawsuits Cohen paid off for Trump. They were paid for not disclosing "affairs" but in fact those episodes were paid sexwork, cost not disclosed that I remember. People assume that sex workers enjoy what they do, but the person who is paying for the sex is the one who presumably enjoys. The sex worker is just doing a job. It's a bit dangerous because of the dynamics of guilt, control, stereotyping. The sex worker mind is not on their own ecstasy, but on what will please the customer and bring him back. Trump was not doing these women a big favor -- it was simply a transaction and I'm guessing not pleasant for the women. But that's the only way Trump ever treats anything, as a buy/sell transaction. No different from the concrete business or casinos. He sued over them, too.
PROFESSOR VAKNIN'S RANT
They do not want to be observed or analyzed, each carrying the guilt and shame of their existence itself. The best hope is for them to find something worth living for, without any institutions trying to grab them, without being pressed into the military, without having to turn to Mafia, without even turning to female compatriots. This is close to defining a ground of being that is not quicksand. The days when academics were protected have also disappeared. Being an adjunct professor is pretty much the same as being homeless, like these boys. What a shock. How enlightening and challenging.
Thursday, July 23, 2020
CONSUMER REPORT
UNDERGROUND WATER
|
Number of wells in County
|
1519
|
Deepest well on record (feet)
|
2080
|
Shallowest well on record (feet)
|
3
|
Most recent well on record
|
7/2/2019
|
Oldest well on record
|
1/1/1885
|
Number of water quality samples
|
173
|
Number of measured water levels
|
204174
|
4
|